Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Spiral Out »

Obi1 wrote:I always think intelligent life "must" exist elsewhere in the cosmos if it is true that the cosmos is infinitely large and filled with infinite matter. Assuming both are true why do I assume this? I always tell myself that all the permutations of matter and events exist somewhere out there but that can't be true. For an extreme example there can't be a world where a person wakes up every morning and does one head-stand in each room, repaints his kitchen, and buys 10 new pet dogs. I say this because it is against intelligent behavior so like we would say something is "physically impossible" that scenario would be against intelligent life-form behavior.

So why should I assume that there must be life out there if I don't really believe that every thing that can exist would exist in an infinite universe?
Why would life, even so-called "intelligent" life, be required to conform to our own particular paradigm of what we conceive of as intelligent, or even life, for that matter?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Renee
Posts: 327
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 10:39 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Frigyes Karinthy

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Renee »

Spiral Out wrote: Why would life, even so-called "intelligent" life, be required to conform to our own particular paradigm of what we conceive of as intelligent, or even life, for that matter?
Because life, and "intelligent" life is possible, and the universe is infinitely large.

There may be other intelligentsia out there, you're right. But our kind is possible, that's for sure. And space is infinitely expansive. Although we are not sure of the same being true fo' matter. That's an assumption you need to make.
Ignorance is power.
Platos stepchild
Posts: 545
Joined: July 19th, 2014, 9:58 pm

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Platos stepchild »

Spiral Out wrote:Why would life, even so-called "intelligent" life, be required to conform to our own particular paradigm of what we conceive of as intelligent, or even life, for that matter?
I've heard speculation that extraterrestrial-life might be so exotic that we'd never be able to recognize it. While this might be possible, that possibility does nothing to establish the criteria for such exotic life-forms. And, if we're talking about intelligent life, there'd be absolutely no basis for communicating with it. And, without communication, we might as well be alone in the cosmos.

Furthermore, once we've posited the existence of exotic cosmic intelligences, we've opened the door to other extreme possibilities, such as the oceans and even the earth, itself being organisms in their own right. But, any definition of life which is so inclusive undercuts what it means to live. It's only within a dead, or inanimate context that we can truly understand and appreciate life.

The unique valance of carbon atoms probably means that life based on some other element is highly unlikely. Even so, exotic life is still possible within a carbon-context. The helix of "normal" DNA is right-handed. But, there's no reason why "left-handed" DNA couldn't thrive, elsewhere in the cosmos. Nevertheless, any life evolving from such DNA would still be constrained by the same evolutionary pressures as life on Earth.

Intelligent-life springing from left-handed DNA should still share enough in common with us to allow at least a formal, mathematical rapport. Bilaterally symmetrical bodies would give rise to a mathematically rigorous understanding of symmetry, which is an essential aesthetic of mathematics. Being carbon-based means that intelligent aliens would eat as we eat, and survive as we survive. The helical orientation of their DNA wouldn't affect their rapport with us.

Now, when I say "rapport", I don't mean to imply that we'd be natural allies. I'm only saying there'd be some basis for understanding. Still, their technology might be sufficiently advanced so as to be incompatible with our own. Regardless though, whether friend, foe or something in between, we'd share enough in common to recognize each other as friend, foe or something in between. And that's why extraterrestrial-life, intelligent or not would follow a terrestial paradigm.
User avatar
Renee
Posts: 327
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 10:39 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Frigyes Karinthy

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Renee »

Platos stepchild wrote:... And, without communication, we might as well be alone in the cosmos. ...
The unique valance of carbon atoms probably means that life based on some other element is highly unlikely.
I concur on the first point. That's why I hold SETI pointless.

Second point: I wish to add that the element Silicone (or silicon?) under high temperatures (higher than in our biosphere) has valental similarities to carbon. Thus, in the Earth's mantle there may be silicon-based life forms.

This assumes that complexity is required for life or for intelligence. However, this assumption is not completely founded, although it has its merits: For intelligence, one must be able to create a mental image of the world, in order to use it as a road map in navigating one's self in the reality world. Therefore the mental image must bear enough semblance to reality to be a reasonably reliable model. This requires complexity.

Complexity is required if reality is to be interpreted or imagined. There may be life forms that experience reality directly, without a need of translation; these forms may be simple, as the brain's overwhelming functionality is spent on interpretation, imaging, and planning. These are not needed for a being that needs to do no interpretation of the sensual feed of the environment. They would act intelligently, mightily so, but they would not use interpretive and planning intelligence, most of which is what makes human intelligence. Therefore these non-interpretive beings may be simple in their structure.

Going back to silicon, we may have life underneath the surface of earth, many hundreds of kilometres down. This life form would not know stars, the sun. Although it may learn about the rotation of the earth. God only knows (figure of speech) how it lives and operates. Only it can produce helical DNA forms aside from carbon.
Ignorance is power.
User avatar
Whisper Wizard
New Trial Member
Posts: 8
Joined: March 15th, 2014, 6:53 pm

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Whisper Wizard »

Because all possibilities and all potential possibilities are two different things. It sounds like you are confusing infinite universe with infinite dimensions where rules of physics and rationality can very. In a universe, everything has to abide by the sound logic of how it works. Everything comes from the same concept of matter, energy, and all that good stuff. Reason far in the universe you aren't likely to see some material Gargaungeltik that is completely foreign to everything we know that exists. We believe everything is matter and energy so it is reasonable to assume that atleast this universe also is fully constructed by matter and energy without differing at a certain point. Same thing applies with culture, pre-destiny, mentality, whatever you would apply to intelligent life. Your comparison might sound silly when said and it most likely is. Though, let's not forget those comparisons of a normal life to someone buying ten dogs in a day is still similar in the fact it is a person doing things we understand.
Platos stepchild
Posts: 545
Joined: July 19th, 2014, 9:58 pm

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Platos stepchild »

Renee wrote:
Plato's stepchild wrote:... And, without communication, we might as well be alone in the cosmos. ...
The unique valence of carbon atoms probably means that life based on some other element is highly unlikely.
I concur on the first point. That's why I hold SETI pointless.

Second point: I wish to add that the element silicon, under high temperatures (higher than in our biosphere) has valence similar to carbon. Thus, in the Earth's mantle there may be silicon-based life forms.

This assumes that complexity is required for life or for intelligence. However, this assumption is not completely founded, although it has its merits: For intelligence, one must be able to create a mental image of the world, in order to use it as a road map in navigating one's self in the reality world. Therefore the mental image must bear enough semblance to reality to be a reasonably reliable model. This requires complexity.

Complexity is required if reality is to be interpreted or imagined. There may be life forms that experience reality directly, without a need of translation; these forms may be simple, as the brain's overwhelming functionality is spent on interpretation, imaging, and planning. These are not needed for a being that needs to do no interpretation of the sensual feed of the environment. They would act intelligently, mightily so, but they would not use interpretive and planning intelligence, most of which is what makes human intelligence. Therefore these non-interpretive beings may be simple in their structure.

Going back to silicon, we may have life underneath the surface of earth, many hundreds of kilometres down. This life form would not know stars, the sun. Although it may learn about the rotation of the earth. God only knows (figure of speech) how it lives and operates. Only it can produce helical DNA forms aside from carbon.
Yes, it's true; silicon does belong to group 14 (along with carbon) of the periodic table of elements. Silicon, however (unlike carbon) doesn't form "double bonds", and therefore isn't nearly as chemically active. This is why I said that "life based on some element [other than carbon] is highly unlikely" (though not impossible).

Regarding complexity as being necessary for life, it just seems reasonable (to me, at least) that there must exist a threshold, such that anything less is too simple. Of course, defining just where that "threshold" lies is quite slippery. Therefore, the importance of complexity as a precursor of life is equally slippery.

It's interesting that you're allowing an alien intelligence might experience reality, directly. If so, then the complexity of that intelligence need only be as "complex" as the reality it's experiencing. A consequence of your assumption is that reality might possibly "experience" itself, without an intermediate intelligence. As I said, interesting.
User avatar
Renee
Posts: 327
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 10:39 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Frigyes Karinthy

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Renee »

Platos stepchild wrote: Yes, it's true; silicon does belong to group 14 (along with carbon) of the periodic table of elements. Silicon, however (unlike carbon) doesn't form "double bonds", and therefore isn't nearly as chemically active.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/dou ... 49.article

In a landmark for silicon chemistry, US researchers have reported the first stable silicon (0) compound to contain a silicon-silicon double bond.

’What baffles me is that this complex is a truly stable, "bottleable" species, not just a molecule which is observed in a low-temperature matrix,’ comments Gernot Frenking, professor of theoretical chemistry at the Philipps-Universit?t in Marburg, Germany.

(Sorry!!) (-;
Ignorance is power.
User avatar
Diego_tentor
New Trial Member
Posts: 3
Joined: November 25th, 2016, 5:04 am

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Diego_tentor »

I always think intelligent life "must" exist elsewhere in the cosmos if it is true that the cosmos is infinitely large and filled with infinite matter. Assuming both are true why do I assume this? I always tell myself that all the permutations of matter and events exist somewhere out there but that can't be true. For an extreme example there can't be a world where a person wakes up every morning and does one head-stand in each room, repaints his kitchen, and buys 10 new pet dogs. I say this because it is against intelligent behavior so like we would say something is "physically impossible" that scenario would be against intelligent life-form behavior.

So why should I assume that there must be life out there if I don't really believe that every thing that can exist would exist in an infinite universe?
The trouble here is that you (like any of us) do not know or have exactly defined that it is "life" and that it is "intelligence", so really what you are looking for is not life or intelligence but anthropomorphic mirages or geomorphic life.

That is similar to, in a square full of people, just consider 'people' to someone who has my stature, speak my language and have my own scars.
User avatar
Renee
Posts: 327
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 10:39 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Frigyes Karinthy

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Renee »

Diego_tentor wrote: The trouble here is that you (like any of us) do not know or have exactly defined that it is "life" and that it is "intelligence", so really what you are looking for is not life or intelligence but anthropomorphic mirages or geomorphic life.

That is similar to, in a square full of people, just consider 'people' to someone who has my stature, speak my language and have my own scars.
I don't believe that not defining life and intelligence is trouble. These are two words that are undefinable. (Undefiably undefinable, at that.) Much like some math functions with continuous curves don't have an integral function.

We don't define "life", "intelligence", "god", "time", but we all understand the same thing with little variation what the other means when says some of these words.

This is not my objection. Wittgenstein pointed this out to the world, when the logical positivists wanted to write the "Big Encyclopedia" back in the early 1900s. The LPs had the idea that all we needed to do to fix philosophy and knowledge was to finely and precisely define each term in the language. They hung up, though, and did not know what hit them until Wittgenstein came along and explained it to them.
Ignorance is power.
User avatar
Diego_tentor
New Trial Member
Posts: 3
Joined: November 25th, 2016, 5:04 am

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Diego_tentor »

I don't believe that not defining life and intelligence is trouble. These are two words that are undefinable. (Undefiably undefinable, at that.) Much like some math functions with continuous curves don't have an integral function.

We don't define "life", "intelligence", "god", "time", but we all understand the same thing with little variation what the other means when says some of these words.
This is not my objection. Wittgenstein pointed this out to the world, when the logical positivists wanted to write the "Big Encyclopedia" back in the early 1900s. The LPs had the idea that all we needed to do to fix philosophy and knowledge was to finely and precisely define each term in the language. They hung up, though, and did not know what hit them until Wittgenstein came along and explained it to them.


Obviously it is not a problem to seek intelligence, if it is a problem to find it, because what it seeks is defined only by its appearance, not by its function.

It is similar to looking for a needle in a haystack, without knowing what a needle is, there (metaphorically speaking) a doctor will discard any needle that does not look like a syringe, a seamstress will discard any needle that does not have an eye on the needle. And a weaver will discard any needle that does not have its corresponding pair.

Then such a search will be no different from that of a man seeking God, or that of a ufologic looking for humanoids, each establishing a search based on a subjective desire. It would not be very different from the Spanish settlers arriving to the americas and considering animal anything that was not baptized.

You will find 'intelligence' as far as the search criteria are concerned, with the current criteria we are still alone in space.
They hung up, though, and did not know what hit them until Wittgenstein came along and explained it to them.
What does wittgenstein explain?
gimal
Posts: 54
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by gimal »

How can you talk about life when biologists don't even know what life is -they may know what life does but they don't know what life is.


gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-conten ... cience.pdf




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

take this definition from wiki
"Life is a characteristic that distinguishes objects that have self-sustaining biological processes ("alive," "living"), from those which do not"

this is a blantaly circular definition all it says is life is a characteristic of things that are alive ie have life and as such totally meaningless

now even apart from not telling us what it is that gives life to an organism scientist cant even agree on their definition of life
To define life in unequivocal terms is still a challenge for scientists


with out being able to agree on what life does- let alone not being able to tell us what LIFE IS - the whole foundation of biology collapses


1) Biology is the study of life but Biologists don’t know what life is
biology tells us what life does but it cant tell us what it is that makes an organism alive ie the life force

User avatar
Renee
Posts: 327
Joined: May 3rd, 2015, 10:39 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Frigyes Karinthy

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Renee »

gimal wrote:How can you talk about life when biologists don't even know what life is -they may know what life does but they don't know what life is.
Gimal, you don't know what life is, but you talk about it. What sort of a hypocritical superiority complex gives you the alleged and self-appointed right to stop others from talking about life?

-- Updated December 2nd, 2016, 10:21 pm to add the following --
Diego_tentor wrote:
I don't believe that not defining life and intelligence is trouble. These are two words that are undefinable. (Undefiably undefinable, at that.) Much like some math functions with continuous curves don't have an integral function.

We don't define "life", "intelligence", "god", "time", but we all understand the same thing with little variation what the other means when says some of these words.
This is not my objection. Wittgenstein pointed this out to the world, when the logical positivists wanted to write the "Big Encyclopedia" back in the early 1900s. The LPs had the idea that all we needed to do to fix philosophy and knowledge was to finely and precisely define each term in the language. They hung up, though, and did not know what hit them until Wittgenstein came along and explained it to them.


Obviously it is not a problem to seek intelligence, if it is a problem to find it, because what it seeks is defined only by its appearance, not by its function.

It is similar to looking for a needle in a haystack, without knowing what a needle is, there (metaphorically speaking) a doctor will discard any needle that does not look like a syringe, a seamstress will discard any needle that does not have an eye on the needle. And a weaver will discard any needle that does not have its corresponding pair.

Then such a search will be no different from that of a man seeking God, or that of a ufologic looking for humanoids, each establishing a search based on a subjective desire. It would not be very different from the Spanish settlers arriving to the americas and considering animal anything that was not baptized.

You will find 'intelligence' as far as the search criteria are concerned, with the current criteria we are still alone in space.
They hung up, though, and did not know what hit them until Wittgenstein came along and explained it to them.
What does wittgenstein explain?
Diego tentor, you nicely backpedalled and changed the nature and substance of your question.

If I answer your current question, what are the chances that you will not apply the same "tactic"? In strict numerical terms.
Ignorance is power.
Platos stepchild
Posts: 545
Joined: July 19th, 2014, 9:58 pm

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Platos stepchild »

I believe we must first recognize that which we wish to explain. What this means is, we must first recognize intelligence before attempting to explain it. If we define intelligence prematurely, we risk defining something so exotic that we'll never know it for what it is. That's when we get entangled in philosophical conundrums which have no resolution.

But, how can we be so sure that our gut will recognize exotic intelligences? That's just a chance we have to take. Otherwise, we risk those troublesome conundrums. Besides, if something is too out there, then what does it matter, anyway? All that really matters is whether they'd be an asset or a threat. Are we their food, or friends?

We don't know, for sure that extraterrestrial intelligences exist, much less whether we'd recognize them. But, who can say for sure, whether in the vastness of space an intelligence, similar to ourselves might lurk? I believe it's better to assume the worst, than to hope for the best. We should anticipate attacks from deep space just as we should anticipate killer asteroids.

Let's make E.T the 21st century bogeyman. It'd give us the chance to rally around our mutual survival. If we don't, then sectarian violence will destroy us. Surely it's better to fear the alien menace than to fear the Muslims, or to hate the decadent West. But, what if an alien intelligence turns out to be benevolent? So what? They probably don't even exist. Just let the nonexistent threat ensure our survival.
User avatar
Chasw
Posts: 153
Joined: September 1st, 2012, 9:13 am
Favorite Philosopher: GWF Hegel
Location: Seattle, USA
Contact:

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by Chasw »

An interesting topic. The genesis of life on Earth is still unknown. So, we speculate. Here is what we know so far: The oldest fossil evidence of lifeforms dates from early in the planet's history, about 3.5 million years ago. Since I don't subscribe to abiogenesis, my working hypothesis is that the Earth's oceans were seeded with bacterial lifeforms, probably via comets impacting the planet, as soon as the surface cooled sufficiently and the oceans acquired enough dissolved minerals. Among those lifeforms were cyanobacteria which immediately went to work "terraforming" the Earth's atmosphere from primarily carbon dioxide to primarily nitrogen and oxygen. This then opened the door, through evolution, to higher forms of life, including animals.

If comets carried the seeds of life here, as I speculate, then the genesis must have begun elsewhere. One possible speculation is, there once was a fertile planet in another system that was blown apart by a dying star. The planet's teeming oceans were instantly frozen by the cold of space and drifted to the place where our solar system formed out of the remnants. If you don't believe life can survive in the cold of space, consider how bacterial spores entombed in rock salt formations have survived for hundreds of million years.

Valid evidence supporting my hypothesis would be signs of life, such as fossils, on Mars or the moons of Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune. In fact, the primary driver for mankind's current exploration of Mars is the possibility of finding such evidence. - CW
The central question of human existence is not why we are here, but rather why we behave the way we do - http://onhumanaffairs.blogspot.com/
User avatar
JamesOfSeattle
Premium Member
Posts: 509
Joined: October 16th, 2015, 11:20 pm

Re: Life "must" exist elsewhere but why?

Post by JamesOfSeattle »

ChasW, I'm curious as to why you think abiogenesis could occur somewhere else, but not here. Actually, I think the timing of things might be strong evidence that it did happen here. My understanding (which could easily be wrong) is that there was very little time between when life could exist on earth and when it did exist on earth. To say it again, just about as soon as the earth was cool enough for liquid oceans, it had life.

So either there was an astronomically unlikely (ahem) coincidence in timing, or there was a bombardment of extraterrestrial life over a long period of time and we should expect to find the results of that bombardment all over our solar system.

*
(Or it started here)
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021