Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
Wayne92587
Posts: 1780
Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Wayne92587 »

Mind and Body, spirit and flesh, the material
  • and the immaterial are not a paradox.
    You have to go back before the Big Bang to understand the existence of the immaterial when pure Heat energy was the only thing that existed.

    Before the Big Bang, The All was the only thing, that existed.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Consul »

RJG wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 7:52 am
Consul wrote:Solipsism is absurd!
It's "absurdity" (dislikableness) is not a valid reason to discount it possibility.
It's a mere logical possibility that doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.

"As against solipsism it is to be said, in the first place, that it is psychologically impossible to believe, and is rejected in fact even by those who mean to accept it. I once received a letter from an eminent logician, Mrs. Christine Ladd Franklin, saying that she was a solipsist, and was surprised that there were no others. Coming from a logician, this surprise surprised me. The fact that I cannot believe something does not prove that it is false, but it does prove that I am insincere and frivolous if I pretend to believe it. Cartesian doubt has value as a means of articulating our knowledge and showing what depends on what, but if carried too far it becomes a mere technical game in which philosophy loses seriousness. Whatever anybody, even I myself, may argue to the contrary, I shall continue to believe that I am not the whole universe, and in this every one will in fact agree with me, if I am right in my conviction that other people exist."

(Russell, Bertrand. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. 1948. Reprint, Abingdon: Routledge, 2009. p. 161)

By the way, speaking precisely, there is a distinction between

1. ontological solipsism: I am the only (existing) object.

2. psychological solipsism: I am the only (existing) subject. (No other object has a mind or consciousness.)

(1 includes 2, but 2 doesn't include 1.)

3. epistemological solipsism: I cannot know whether other objects are subjects.

(3 includes neither 1 nor 2.)

What I call absurd are 1&2, but 3 concerns the epistemic problem of other minds that does deserve to be taken seriously.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Consul »

Wayne92587 wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 12:10 pm
Consul; Substance dualism is the view that there are both material substances (bodies) and immaterial ones (souls).
There is no such animal as substance Duality. The Soul, consciousness, has no substance, is immaterial.
That's why it's called an immaterial or spiritual substance!

As for "substance" as a technical term in metaphysics/ontology, see: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by RJG »

Consul wrote:Solipsism is absurd!
RJG wrote:It's "absurdity" (dislikableness) is not a valid reason to discount it possibility.
Consul wrote:It's a mere logical possibility that doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
The "doesn't deserve to be taken seriously" is an 'emotional' justification, not a 'rational' one.

Bertrand Russell (via Consul) wrote:"Whatever anybody, even I myself, may argue to the contrary, I shall continue to believe that I am not the whole universe…
As illustrated here, Russell's distaste/dislike of solipsism dictates his belief. He lets emotion, rather than logic, dictate his belief.

Bertrand Russell (via Consul) wrote:...and in this every one will in fact agree with me, if I am right in my conviction that other people exist."
Here, Russell commits the logical fallacy of "begging-the-question" so as to fallaciously justify an emotional belief. The "everyone will agree with me" pre-assumes the conclusion that "other people exist" (i.e. a non-solipsist condition).

Consul wrote:What I call absurd are 1&2, but 3 concerns the epistemic problem of other minds that does deserve to be taken seriously.
An appeal-to-absurdity (or -to-ugliness, or to-icky-ness, or -to-awful-ness) is logically fallacious reasoning. "Absurdity" has absolutely no place in logical reasoning. Its use is confined only to "name-calling" and irrationally justifying one's emotional beliefs.
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Consul wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 1:25 pm 3. epistemological solipsism: I cannot know whether other objects are subjects.
Can we really doubt whether those we are discussing with are subjects? Can you doubt that I am a subject? Language presupposes other subjects. I would call also this version of solipsism absurd. Like: "I cannot know whether this sentence exists." I know it exists, and because it exists, I have language at my disposal, and there is no use for language if I am alone. Do we need other proofs?
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by RJG »

Tamminen wrote:Can we really doubt whether those we are discussing with are subjects? Can you doubt that I am a subject? Language presupposes other subjects. I would call also this version of solipsism absurd. Like: "I cannot know whether this sentence exists." I know it exists, and because it exists, I have language at my disposal, and there is no use for language if I am alone. Do we need other proofs?
Without language, then how could I talk to all of you, my zombie friends out there? :)
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

RJG wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 5:05 pm
Tamminen wrote:Can we really doubt whether those we are discussing with are subjects? Can you doubt that I am a subject? Language presupposes other subjects. I would call also this version of solipsism absurd. Like: "I cannot know whether this sentence exists." I know it exists, and because it exists, I have language at my disposal, and there is no use for language if I am alone. Do we need other proofs?
Without language, then how could I talk to all of you, my zombie friends out there? :)
:D
Wayne92587
Posts: 1780
Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Wayne92587 »

Singularity, the All, is not only ever present, an infinitely Finite indivisible Singularity, the All is also Omniscient.
Wayne92587
Posts: 1780
Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Wayne92587 »

The Uncaused Reality of First Cause


Quantum as an Ever-present Singularity, but also as an Omniscient State, Field, of Singularity having an unspoken Number, Quantity of Infinitely Finite Indivisible Singular Particles, Quantum, Primary Particles, having no Numerical, Value, having a numerical value of Zero-0.

Creation beginning as an Affect, as the result of the displacement and conversion, the metamorphosis, of a Singular, a Random Quantum Particle of Zero-0, without cause, intent, a Singularity of Zero-0 was reborn the Reality of First Cause, as an Affect, “the result of a bump in the Night, Darkness”, a Singularity of Zero-0 due to a change in the nature of Motion, the result of displacement attained angular momentum, velocity of speed and direction became measurable as to momentum and location within the All, became the first in a Series to attain relative, numerical, value of One-1

The Reality of First Cause, being a random Singularity, became the first Singularity, Quantum, Particle of Zero-0 to attained a Numerical value of One-1, resulting in the System of Chaos threw Quantum Entanglement, Spooky Action at a Distance, that has made manifest the Heavens and the Earth, the Universe, the Reality of Everything that exists in the Material sense of the Word, Reality as seen in the Light of Day.

This thought is Unfinished ?
Chili
Posts: 392
Joined: September 29th, 2017, 4:59 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Chili »

Tamminen wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 4:38 pm
Consul wrote: January 2nd, 2019, 1:25 pm 3. epistemological solipsism: I cannot know whether other objects are subjects.
Can we really doubt whether those we are discussing with are subjects? Can you doubt that I am a subject? Language presupposes other subjects. I would call also this version of solipsism absurd. Like: "I cannot know whether this sentence exists." I know it exists, and because it exists, I have language at my disposal, and there is no use for language if I am alone. Do we need other proofs?
It's like you haven't read much science fiction ! It is essential for discussing this type of philosophy. There are completely automatic machines which can easily convince the uncritical that there is a conscious subject at the other end.
Chili
Posts: 392
Joined: September 29th, 2017, 4:59 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Chili »

I cannot know whether this sentence exists OBJECTIVELY - i.e. am I dreaming?
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by RJG »

Chili wrote:I cannot know whether this sentence exists OBJECTIVELY - i.e. am I dreaming?
Maybe you are, or maybe I am just dreaming this response. Since we can't trust our perceptions to tell us our perceptions are true, we can't know if we are dreaming/hallucinating/whatever.
User avatar
cavacava
Posts: 55
Joined: October 12th, 2018, 11:10 am

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by cavacava »

RJG wrote: January 19th, 2019, 2:57 pm
Chili wrote:I cannot know whether this sentence exists OBJECTIVELY - i.e. am I dreaming?
Maybe you are, or maybe I am just dreaming this response. Since we can't trust our perceptions to tell us our perceptions are true, we can't know if we are dreaming/hallucinating/whatever.
Well it is certain that we whatever our perceptions tell us, it something, even if it is possibly delusional and in my opinion that's all we can know for sure, all the rest is abstraction, where pragmatic validity has greater force than truth.

Are you familiar with Mary's Room?
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by RJG »

cavacava wrote:Are you familiar with Mary's Room?
Mary's Room is a non-sensical thought experiment. It's conclusion (of non-physicalism) does not logically follow from its premise (of experiencing a 'new' experience).
Jan Sand
Posts: 658
Joined: September 10th, 2017, 11:57 am

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Jan Sand »

See https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 175621.htm where a robotic hand is conscious of itself and can teach itself new tricks.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021