Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by RJG »

RJG wrote:There are no "intentional" objects of your consciousness. If you experience "intention" then this is a just another 'X' experience (content) of your consciousness.
Consul wrote:Here "intentional" relates to intentionality ("aboutness") and not to intention.
Consul - Why use the term "intentional" to refer to the object of consciousness? --- Is there then such a thing as a "non-intentional" object of consciousness?

If "intention" in this context means "aboutness", then does there exist "non-aboutness" objects of consciousness?

Or is it that Husserl is trying to make the point (as I have made) that without an object ('X') there can be no consciousness, ...and in this sense, consciousness is not consciousness if it is not "about" an object (X)???

And if so, then aren't ALL objects of consciousness, by default, considered "intentional"? ...and if so, then what is the purpose for saying, or adding this word, when it adds no value or new information to the statement?
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Sy Borg »

Another thought: Consciousness survives physical death because, after one snuffs it, there's still plenty of consciousness left in the world! What survives even longer is approximate morphology. That is, people are variably similar or different in terms of how they fit into and function in communities, which is ultimately a critical aspect of what it means to be you - how you relate to the world.

Your "youness" is unique. However, simply through probability, there will be a small number of people around the globe who function so similarly to you in their society that it would blow your mind. Then there will be a larger number who are similar to you, but less so. Logically, if you continue this process of likening there will be a pyramid - the point being the unique individual type followed by the most similar people, then the next, followed by a diminishing degree of similarity. Each person is both the apex of their own "pyramid of likeness" and part of others' pyramids. I would personally extend the pyramids beyond species (and beyond that) but I suspect for many that would be a bridge too far :)

Re: Consciousness and death, as mentioned earlier, a conscious sense of being apparently only lasts as long as the brain does, but how long those final few minutes feel to an individual undergoing a significant NDE is unknown. Based on NDE reports, the subjective sense of time dilation can be significant. As with dreams, the time dilation is apparent rather than actual. That is, memories of events are significantly compressed (not unlike an MPEG file). Information that is not emotionally resonant is removed, eg. dreamers tend to subjectively teleport from one scenario to the next.

If the compression becomes ever greater as the brain dies, who knows how much subjective afterlife can be crammed into that final 3-7 minutes? The possibilities there are both exciting and daunting! Think happy thoughts ... :)
BigBango
Posts: 343
Joined: March 15th, 2018, 6:15 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by BigBango »

Greta wrote: January 8th, 2019, 2:14 am
Re: Consciousness and death, as mentioned earlier, a conscious sense of being apparently only lasts as long as the brain does, but how long those final few minutes feel to an individual undergoing a significant NDE is unknown. Based on NDE reports, the subjective sense of time dilation can be significant. As with dreams, the time dilation is apparent rather than actual. That is, memories of events are significantly compressed (not unlike an MPEG file). Information that is not emotionally resonant is removed, eg. dreamers tend to subjectively teleport from one scenario to the next.

If the compression becomes ever greater as the brain dies, who knows how much subjective afterlife can be crammed into that final 3-7 minutes? The possibilities there are both exciting and daunting! Think happy thoughts ... :)
Greta, thank you for getting us back on track with the OP.

Your assumption that consciousness dies when the brain dies is problematic. I doubt you have any real evidence for that except that it is consistent with a theory of consciousness that is simply the result of the product of the evolution of the nervous system. So when the brain dies so does your individual consciousness die.

You are exactly right that when you die the "consciousness" of any being in this world is dead as far as its engagement with the physical world it is immersed in. However, is that loss really a loss of all consciousness? If you would give more than lip service to the idea of fractals than you would realize that our conscious identity actually crosses the worlds that existed before the BB.
User avatar
Count Lucanor
Posts: 2318
Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
Location: Panama
Contact:

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Count Lucanor »

BigBango wrote: January 9th, 2019, 12:35 am Your assumption that consciousness dies when the brain dies is problematic. I doubt you have any real evidence for that
BigBango wrote: January 9th, 2019, 12:35 am ... our conscious identity actually crosses the worlds that existed before the BB.
I doubt you have any real evidence for that.
The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
User avatar
The Beast
Posts: 1403
Joined: July 7th, 2013, 10:32 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by The Beast »

Obviously. Our exuberance must have a Universal language. The same way we have a link to our parents, the cells of our body have a link to the primordial elements… and yet so materialistic. If there are Universal abstracts and some humans have a connection to them (values) then, the values are a quantity in whatever unit (undiscovered) the abstract is measured. This which is something cannot be nothing and It may not need a substrate. Although, alter mental events are a rarity, scarabs were used by ancient people to ward off the spirits wandering (in matter) waiting for a suitable host. Since that which is not a Universal abstract is a lie then a certain unitary value is attached to a substrate…
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Sy Borg »

Count Lucanor wrote: January 9th, 2019, 2:28 pm
BigBango wrote: January 9th, 2019, 12:35 am Your assumption that consciousness dies when the brain dies is problematic. I doubt you have any real evidence for that
BigBango wrote: January 9th, 2019, 12:35 am ... our conscious identity actually crosses the worlds that existed before the BB.
I doubt you have any real evidence for that.
No one has real evidence to support their views here, only enough to suggest to them that they may be right. If hard evidence is required then the only option is to follow the medical profession in this issue without extrapolation, even though this issue is not their concern.
Wmhoerr
Posts: 46
Joined: January 3rd, 2019, 1:51 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell
Contact:

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Wmhoerr »

The term "induction" has been used in some of the arguments above. Let's do some backwards induction. Now let's say consciousness survives death, then it is logical that the consciousness of your parents also survived. And so on backwards. Then we get to homo erectus. Do we stop there, no we keep going. What about going back all the way to fish. As soon as we stop we get to a child who's consciousness survives and a parent who's consciousness does not. Of course, Buddhists would be happy with this logic as they see most things as conscious, but for the evolutionist the argument gets more and more unbelievable. I see the idea that consciousness survives death as an exercise in people thinking that they are more important than they are.
User avatar
Count Lucanor
Posts: 2318
Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
Location: Panama
Contact:

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Count Lucanor »

Greta wrote: January 9th, 2019, 4:30 pm
Count Lucanor wrote: January 9th, 2019, 2:28 pm

I doubt you have any real evidence for that.
No one has real evidence to support their views here, only enough to suggest to them that they may be right. If hard evidence is required then the only option is to follow the medical profession in this issue without extrapolation, even though this issue is not their concern.
My view here is that there's no evidence of a disembodied consciousness and of an immaterial realm where the consciousness that is supposed to survive bodily death goes to. The lack of evidences supports my view.
The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Belindi »

How could there be consciousness if there is nothing there to be conscious?
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Felix »

Wmhoerr: Now let's say consciousness survives death, then it is logical that the consciousness of your parents also survived. And so on backwards.
You've confused personal identity with consciousness, obviously the ego does not survive death, but it is not the ego that is purported to do so.

And people are also confusing consciousness with subject/object awareness in this thread, the consciousness that survives death would be untethered from that mode of polarized awareness.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Sy Borg »

Count Lucanor wrote: January 9th, 2019, 9:28 pm
Greta wrote: January 9th, 2019, 4:30 pm
No one has real evidence to support their views here, only enough to suggest to them that they may be right. If hard evidence is required then the only option is to follow the medical profession in this issue without extrapolation, even though this issue is not their concern.
My view here is that there's no evidence of a disembodied consciousness and of an immaterial realm where the consciousness that is supposed to survive bodily death goes to. The lack of evidences supports my view.
You certainty echoes that of those who assumed too quickly down the ages.

If humanity worked out what actually constitutes reality it would be a big help in this question. Alas, we are utterly clueless. We are completely flummoxed by 95% of reality, so termed dark matter and dark energy as placeholders until we work out what the smeg they are. As for the other 5% aka matter/energy, we don't understand what it is either. What is energy? Work; a perturbation in the fabric of space. What is space? An arena consisting of endless perturbations. In a nutshell, that's where we are up to so far.

I see no reason why there would not be numerous possibilities regarding the nature of reality that no one has imagined in the slightest due to anthropomorphic (and -centric) perspective effects. We humans may simply be utterly ill-equipped to perceive most of reality, not least due to our biological computational limitations, our minds usually already stretched to the limit just keeping everyday life on track.

As you know, we humans evolved to perceive that which kept our ancestors alive and reproducing. That is it. Full stop. It worked for them so it was passed down. That leaves a fair gap between the ability to be a fecund organism and comprehending the ultimate nature of being, time and the cosmos. Hence we tend to find such subjects difficult.

Yet humans are attracted to difficult puzzles, aware that permanent gains through cultural transmission are possible with breakthroughs. We have made great progress yet our understanding of natural systems remains very basic. In fact, there's no evidence that we are even close to comprehending the fringes of reality, let alone deeper systemic qualities. My guess (which might be as wrong as anyone else's) is that our relationship with time significantly skews our perceptions of reality, and in ways we are ill-equipped to comprehend.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Sy Borg »

Belindi wrote: January 9th, 2019, 9:34 pmHow could there be consciousness if there is nothing there to be conscious?
What if there is something? Who knows? For all we know there could be informational preservation at the Planck scale. Maybe nothing is really lost? Maybe there are finer granularities beyond space and time (given that Planck scale is only the theorised minimal granularity where time and space can be said to be meaningful concepts)?

I don't quite support mysterianism, though, because that's an assumption too. I'm not saying that we can never understand the nature of consciousness, but that is still a possibility.
User avatar
Count Lucanor
Posts: 2318
Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
Location: Panama
Contact:

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Count Lucanor »

Greta wrote: January 9th, 2019, 10:16 pm
Count Lucanor wrote: January 9th, 2019, 9:28 pm
My view here is that there's no evidence of a disembodied consciousness and of an immaterial realm where the consciousness that is supposed to survive bodily death goes to. The lack of evidences supports my view.
You certainty echoes that of those who assumed too quickly down the ages.

If humanity worked out what actually constitutes reality it would be a big help in this question. Alas, we are utterly clueless. We are completely flummoxed by 95% of reality, so termed dark matter and dark energy as placeholders until we work out what the smeg they are. As for the other 5% aka matter/energy, we don't understand what it is either. What is energy? Work; a perturbation in the fabric of space. What is space? An arena consisting of endless perturbations. In a nutshell, that's where we are up to so far.

I see no reason why there would not be numerous possibilities regarding the nature of reality that no one has imagined in the slightest due to anthropomorphic (and -centric) perspective effects. We humans may simply be utterly ill-equipped to perceive most of reality, not least due to our biological computational limitations, our minds usually already stretched to the limit just keeping everyday life on track.

As you know, we humans evolved to perceive that which kept our ancestors alive and reproducing. That is it. Full stop. It worked for them so it was passed down. That leaves a fair gap between the ability to be a fecund organism and comprehending the ultimate nature of being, time and the cosmos. Hence we tend to find such subjects difficult.

Yet humans are attracted to difficult puzzles, aware that permanent gains through cultural transmission are possible with breakthroughs. We have made great progress yet our understanding of natural systems remains very basic. In fact, there's no evidence that we are even close to comprehending the fringes of reality, let alone deeper systemic qualities. My guess (which might be as wrong as anyone else's) is that our relationship with time significantly skews our perceptions of reality, and in ways we are ill-equipped to comprehend.
Epistemological agnosticism is nothing more than the old God of the Gaps, applied to the universe as the whole of reality. It's not true that we live in almost complete ignorance of what reality is all about, but that's the argument that epistemological agnosticism needs to advance, using the same God of the Gaps technique of constantly moving the goalpost. Religious certainties about supernatural powers ruling the universe arose from people's ignorance about the real natural causes of phenomena, but as scientific knowledge progressed, the old supernatural idealism kept regrouping in the remaining gaps, and trying to expand it. The problem with all of this, of course, as it happens with the God of the Gaps argument, is that those who stand for it, in theory should feel themselves obligated to affirm absolutely nothing, as nothing could be affirmed for which there could not appear a negation in the future, since "everything is possible", anything goes. But of course, we know that as in the God of the Gaps, epistemological agnosticism cares very little about holding back its affirmations, actually it just wants the space for the free non-restricted affirmation of anything. What hides behind it? The old supernatural idealism, religion in disguise.

A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage

Suppose (I'm following a group therapy approach by the psychologist Richard Franklin) I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity!

"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle--but no dragon.

"Where's the dragon?" you ask.

"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon."

You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints.

"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."

Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire.

"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."

You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.

"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick."

And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work.

Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so."


(Sagan, Carl. The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Ballantine: New York, 1996).
The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Sy Borg »

Count Lucanor wrote: January 9th, 2019, 11:54 pm
Greta wrote: January 9th, 2019, 10:16 pm
You certainty echoes that of those who assumed too quickly down the ages.

If humanity worked out what actually constitutes reality it would be a big help in this question. Alas, we are utterly clueless. We are completely flummoxed by 95% of reality, so termed dark matter and dark energy as placeholders until we work out what the smeg they are. As for the other 5% aka matter/energy, we don't understand what it is either. What is energy? Work; a perturbation in the fabric of space. What is space? An arena consisting of endless perturbations. In a nutshell, that's where we are up to so far.

I see no reason why there would not be numerous possibilities regarding the nature of reality that no one has imagined in the slightest due to anthropomorphic (and -centric) perspective effects. We humans may simply be utterly ill-equipped to perceive most of reality, not least due to our biological computational limitations, our minds usually already stretched to the limit just keeping everyday life on track.

As you know, we humans evolved to perceive that which kept our ancestors alive and reproducing. That is it. Full stop. It worked for them so it was passed down. That leaves a fair gap between the ability to be a fecund organism and comprehending the ultimate nature of being, time and the cosmos. Hence we tend to find such subjects difficult.

Yet humans are attracted to difficult puzzles, aware that permanent gains through cultural transmission are possible with breakthroughs. We have made great progress yet our understanding of natural systems remains very basic. In fact, there's no evidence that we are even close to comprehending the fringes of reality, let alone deeper systemic qualities. My guess (which might be as wrong as anyone else's) is that our relationship with time significantly skews our perceptions of reality, and in ways we are ill-equipped to comprehend.
Epistemological agnosticism is nothing more than the old God of the Gaps, applied to the universe as the whole of reality. It's not true that we live in almost complete ignorance of what reality is all about, but that's the argument that epistemological agnosticism needs to advance, using the same God of the Gaps technique of constantly moving the goalpost. Religious certainties about supernatural powers ruling the universe arose from people's ignorance about the real natural causes of phenomena, but as scientific knowledge progressed, the old supernatural idealism kept regrouping in the remaining gaps, and trying to expand it. The problem with all of this, of course, as it happens with the God of the Gaps argument, is that those who stand for it, in theory should feel themselves obligated to affirm absolutely nothing, as nothing could be affirmed for which there could not appear a negation in the future, since "everything is possible", anything goes. But of course, we know that as in the God of the Gaps, epistemological agnosticism cares very little about holding back its affirmations, actually it just wants the space for the free non-restricted affirmation of anything. What hides behind it? The old supernatural idealism, religion in disguise.
You are being defensive. Only you said that the unknown need have anything to do with God or gods. I sure didn't. God is your concern, not mine.

The unknown is exactly that - unknown. If we knew what was unknown then it wouldn't be unknown, would it? It would be the vaguely or somewhat known. I am talking about possibilities of phenomena and dynamics that we all have absolutely no idea about whatsoever.

If you wish to place a straw deity into "the unknown" to use as a punching bag, I hope it makes you feel better so the topic can move on from disproving God, which is still looking at life through an Abrahamic prism.

That is what we need to get away from so we can think about reality clearly, as if religion never existed.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Evidence that Consciousness Survives Bodily Death?

Post by Belindi »

Greta wrote: January 9th, 2019, 10:22 pm
Belindi wrote: January 9th, 2019, 9:34 pmHow could there be consciousness if there is nothing there to be conscious?
What if there is something? Who knows? For all we know there could be informational preservation at the Planck scale. Maybe nothing is really lost? Maybe there are finer granularities beyond space and time (given that Planck scale is only the theorised minimal granularity where time and space can be said to be meaningful concepts)?

I don't quite support mysterianism, though, because that's an assumption too. I'm not saying that we can never understand the nature of consciousness, but that is still a possibility.


I know from introspection that when I sleep without dreaming and also when I dream my 'I' is absent. Only when I'm awake my 'I' makes decisions and choices.I am an 'I'only when awake. I can't be awake when my body is dead.

I know from introspection that I'm not a finer granularity or information, as I'm always conscious of I as a body/mind.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021