Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
Locked
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Eduk »

Dark Matter maybe try slightly less pathological insulting. Maybe less of the 'if you don't agree with me exactly then you are a psychopath' arguments.
Unknown means unknown.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Fanman wrote: January 14th, 2019, 2:47 am DM,
That’s exactly my point. If you’re not interested in what must be in order for what is to be as it is, you’re not really interested in coming to know yourself or how we should live. IOW, you don’t give a damn about the heart of philosophy.
There's no point in trying to have a discussion with you. I have often thought that the criticism aimed at you was harsh, but when you state things like that, I'm not surprised by the way that other forum users react to you.

I used the word "you" in the generic sense. It wasn't personal.

Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences. I'm a realist: if realist dares to say with certainty that there is something bigger, they must be “intolerant,” “rigid,” “closed-minded,” "hate-filled" or "bigoted."
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Note: Metaphysics is a technical term in philosophy that generally refers to our attempt to offer a comprehensive, rational account of the most fundamental aspects of all reality, including that what is beyond the limits of the material universe.
The unknown can be extraordinarily frightening, but our psychological fear, while understandable, must not deter us from our goal of seeking what is true. So long as we remain mesmerized by the illusion of comfort within the bounds of what we believe we know, we will never be able to fathom the depths of [reality].

(John H. Spencer, The Eternal Law: Ancient Greek Philosophy, Modern Physics, and Ultimate Reality)
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Steve3007 »

Dark Matter wrote:Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences.]
You're asserting here that people are motivated by the desire to do various things that they would otherwise feel unable to do. What is the evidence that this is people's motive for favouring Relativism over Absolutism? Could they possibly have some other reason? If you decide to reply to these questions, please don't do it with some short, meaningless, generic answer like "look around you!" or some such thing.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Belindi »

Fdesilva wrote: January 13th, 2019, 3:52 pm
Belindi wrote: January 13th, 2019, 3:28 pm There are truths of myths/poetry, and truths of science, and these are not mutually exclusive. I presumed that the OP meant proofs of science.
proofs of science? Does that mean like a mathematical equation ( E=mc2) ? The existence of proofs entails a proof maker. The way science leads to God for me is via my study of consciousness. We according to the bible are made in His image. That image is most evident in consciousness. I think that is why Michelangelo put God in side a brain.
If you can find the time to have a read my work can be found on the link below. Love to know what you think.
https://philpapers.org/rec/DESCAS
By "proofs of science" I did not mean mathematical or logical proofs, I meant empirical proofs i.e. evidence plus theory proofs.

When you say "the existence of proofs entails a proof maker" this is true if what you mean is that empirical proofs are always set within a cultural paradigm. This being the case the proof maker is the culture within which the proof has meaning.

Poetry and myths don't depend on anything that can be called proof or evidence. Poetry and myths (which include religious devotional texts) present knowledge by acquaintance, not knowledge by description. For instance mathematics and scientific formulae are knowledge by description which includes explanations.

God on the other hand is not explained because God is for believers causa sui. A matter of faith and for mystics a matter of knowledge by acquaintance.
Fanman
Posts: 3258
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 9:42 am

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Fanman »

DM,
Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences. I'm a realist: if realist dares to say with certainty that there is something bigger, they must be “intolerant,” “rigid,” “closed-minded,” "hate-filled" or "bigoted."


Okay, although I don't think being tagged with those negative labels are an automatic result of thinking in the way that you do. Shallow people may judge you based solely upon your world-view, but people with insight will evaluate you based upon your actions and what you say. So being what you describe as a "realist", does not necessarily make you any of those things. Anyway, if there is an absolute truth or a reality that we need to conform to, how do we know what that truth and reality are, and what is at stake if we adopt a relativist approach, rather than an absolute one? I think that in order for your views to be taken seriously, these are the types of questions that you need to try and answer at least reasonably.
Theists believe, agnostics ponder and atheists analyse. A little bit of each should get us the right answer.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Steve3007 wrote: January 14th, 2019, 5:54 am
Dark Matter wrote:Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences.]
You're asserting here that people are motivated by the desire to do various things that they would otherwise feel unable to do. What is the evidence that this is people's motive for favouring Relativism over Absolutism? Could they possibly have some other reason? If you decide to reply to these questions, please don't do it with some short, meaningless, generic answer like "look around you!" or some such thing.
I asserted nothing of the kind. I said what I said: nothing more, nothing less.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Anyway, if there is an absolute truth or a reality that we need to conform to, how do we know what that truth and reality are, and what is at stake if we adopt a relativist approach, rather than an absolute one?
I cannot imagine a better example of moral cowardice.
The unknown can be extraordinarily frightening, but our psychological fear, while understandable, must not deter us from our goal of seeking what is true. (The Eternal Law, pg. 9)
The ancient Platonic philosophers emphasized the discovery of metaphysical unity underlying all of physical reality with the aim of personal transformation in our quest to know ourselves and ‘become like God’ so far as possible. (The Eternal Law, pg. 190)


We may not be able to say for certain to what degree, if any, anything is true, good and beautiful, but what we can know for certain is that if it is, it is only to the degree that it participates in the One. As for what's at stake ... there are whole books on the matter. I can easily cut-and-paste whole chapters if you want.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Steve3007 »

Hi again Fanman! Long time no talk!
Fanman wrote:Anyway, if there is an absolute truth or a reality that we need to conform to, how do we know what that truth and reality are, and what is at stake if we adopt a relativist approach, rather than an absolute one?
On the subject of absolute morality versus relativist morality, my own view is that there is essentially no difference between the two. A moral absolutist tells you some actions that he/she believes to be morally right or wrong. So does a moral relativist. They're both giving you their opinion. In both cases nobody else's opinion is there's to give.

Nevertheless, Dark Matter's assertion is a commonly made one by moral absolutists. It is the assertion that people choose to be moral relativists because it frees them from the notion that they cannot simply do as they choose; that they cannot simply follow their own personal preferences. In other words, it is the assertion that moral relativism is about selfishness. Conversely, a moral relativist might level a similar accusation of selfishness against an absolutist by suggesting that they are setting themselves up as the arbiter of morality by claiming personal access to objective moral truths.

It's an old, old argument isn't it?
Karpel Tunnel
Posts: 948
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Karpel Tunnel »

Dark Matter wrote: January 14th, 2019, 4:34 am Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences. I'm a realist: if realist dares to say with certainty that there is something bigger, they must be “intolerant,” “rigid,” “closed-minded,” "hate-filled" or "bigoted."
I don't see relativism as the predominant philosophy. I see people disagreeing and with great force about what is good and what is bad, as you give the example of above. Perhaps some of those people call themselves relativists, but they are mistaken. Unless they think none of those labels mean the person in question is immoral or bad. If they simply mean them as, in a sense, anthropological labels, they might still be relativists, but I meet very few people who are actually relativists. Further it seems to me that absolutists need not think there is something bigger and relativists could think there is something bigger than us, though it would not be a being who sets the moral terms of the universe. New Agers can be relativists but believe in the one or the flow or the spirit in all things or whatever.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Eduk »

Karpel Tunnel if someone thinks morality is subjective does that make them a relativist?
If someone thinks there is objective truth can they be a relativist?
I'm just wondering if being a relativist immediately means you believe all opinions are equal?
Unknown means unknown.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Karpel Tunnel wrote: January 15th, 2019, 1:01 pm
Dark Matter wrote: January 14th, 2019, 4:34 am Relativism seems to be the predominant philosophy (if you can call it that). People like it because comfortably removes from consideration the notion that we need to conform to a reality that is bigger than our own opinions, values, and preferences. I'm a realist: if realist dares to say with certainty that there is something bigger, they must be “intolerant,” “rigid,” “closed-minded,” "hate-filled" or "bigoted."
I don't see relativism as the predominant philosophy. I see people disagreeing and with great force about what is good and what is bad, as you give the example of above. Perhaps some of those people call themselves relativists, but they are mistaken. Unless they think none of those labels mean the person in question is immoral or bad. If they simply mean them as, in a sense, anthropological labels, they might still be relativists, but I meet very few people who are actually relativists. Further it seems to me that absolutists need not think there is something bigger and relativists could think there is something bigger than us, though it would not be a being who sets the moral terms of the universe. New Agers can be relativists but believe in the one or the flow or the spirit in all things or whatever.
"New Agers" who believe in the one or the flow or the spirit in all things are not relativists in the sense I'm talking about as they believe in something greater than themselves: feelings, sentiments, or cultural milieu are there, but their values are still relative to an Absolute.

We are so immersed in relativism that people who don't see it are like fish blind to the water in which they swim. It's so widespread that its predominance can be called a dictatorship. Right and wrong are widely believed to relative to one’s feelings, sentiments, or cultural milieu rather than grounded in an Absolute (however it may be conceived). Any deviation is met with accusations of “intolerance,” "hatefulness,” "bigotry" and “fascism.” In short, it is fair to describe relativism as a dictatorship.

Without God, without reference to an Absolute (it matters little what idea of God we entertain so long as we are motivated by the ideal of his infinite and eternal nature), the contentious nature of politics can never coordinate its forces, harmonize its divergent and rivalrous interests, races, and nationalisms.
Karpel Tunnel
Posts: 948
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Karpel Tunnel »

Dark Matter wrote: January 15th, 2019, 7:41 pm "New Agers" who believe in the one or the flow olr the spirit in all things are not relativists in the sense I'm talking about as they believe in something greater than themselves: feelings, sentiments, or cultural milieu are there, but their values are still relative to an Absolute.
That's fine, but you are using 'relativists' in an idiosyncratic way. Now that I know, it is clear. It sounds more like a kind of broader atheism, rather than relativism. It's not that they think there is no absolute truth or morals (that is, relativism) but that there is no overarching consciousness, deity, power.
We are so immersed in relativism that people who don't see it are like fish blind to the water in which they swim. It's so widespread that its predominance can be called a dictatorship. Right and wrong are widely believed to relative to one’s feelings, sentiments, or cultural milieu rather than grounded in an Absolute (however it may be conceived). Any deviation is met with accusations of “intolerance,” "hatefulness,” "bigotry" and “fascism.” In short, it is fair to describe relativism as a dictatorship.
Again, if they are judging you morally, then they are not relativists. And people could believe in God and aim those critiques at someone for claiming to know what God wants or considers moral. It feels like two different ideas are being conflated here.
Without God, without reference to an Absolute (it matters little what idea of God we entertain so long as we are motivated by the ideal of his infinite and eternal nature), the contentious nature of politics can never coordinate its forces, harmonize its divergent and rivalrous interests, races, and nationalisms.
Until recenly most people were theists even in the West. Believing in absolute truth didn't seem to eliminate those things in the least. And an atheist can believe in absolute truth. Again, it seems to me two things are being mixed and hopped back and forth from.
Karpel Tunnel
Posts: 948
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Karpel Tunnel »

There are lots of atheists who believe in right and wrong period. Those who complain about the exploitation of workers is one clear group. The people who judge your absolute truths as immmoral are not relativists, they are people who believe in other absolute truths.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?

Post by Dark Matter »

Karpel Tunnel wrote: January 15th, 2019, 8:19 pm It's not that they think there is no absolute truth or morals (that is, relativism) but that there is no overarching consciousness, deity, power.
Yes. Their feet planted firmly on thin air.
Again, if they are judging you morally, then they are not relativists.
Are their judgments well-grounded or planted in thin air?
And an atheist can believe in absolute truth.
And what Absolute truth might that be?
The point here is not belief in God per se, but movement away from the arbitrariness of feelings, sentiments, and cultural milieu. Contemplating the direction that movement inevitably points to an Absolute — the view that there exist such things as abstract objects that do not exist in space or time and yet more real than the material universe.
Locked

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021