But if society does not provide enough care for the workers the workers will get sick and be unproductive. Unless society makes a surplus profit there won't be money to pay for any intellectuals, highly trained professionals, or artists. Unless society provides care for the workers there will be two factions in the society; the poor, and the rich elite. Do you want that? I don't because such a divided society is bad for law and order. Additionally the workers who have not been cared for are less proficient as soldiers , nurses, or policemen and other lower grades of public servants.GE Morton wrote: ↑January 21st, 2019, 1:37 pm"Societies" don't need to be paid for, but certain functions and the institutions which perform them, e.g., maintaining a rule of law, defense, managing natural commons, supplying certain public goods, must be paid for if the society is to provide the advantages for which it is sought. Providing for everyone's personal welfare, however, is not one of those functions. That is the responsibility of each individual member of the society.
It's true that personal welfare should be taught as part of personal responsibility . Social mobility is less likely to happen when many people fail to prosper. Many people fail to prosper when society is divided into rich and poor.