Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
- tingless
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: April 6th, 2019, 6:03 am
Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
I'm trying to understand deontology vs. consequentialism vs. virtue ethics and I'm trying to figure out whether I'm understanding this right.
Here's the example I'm thinking of...
I engage a contractor to do a job and he does the job and everything is fine. Deontology, consequetionalism and virtue ethics say that whether I engage the contractor or not is morally neutral.
Now, same situation as above... except I find out that the contractor (a) cheats on his taxes, or (b) doesn't pay his workers, or (c) uses stolen goods in his work. Now that I know that his work is not above board, does that change the ethics of choosing to engage him? Does the extent to which he's not above board effect the decision? So where I'm stuck is that it seems wrong to engage him... but why?
What if: (d) he says that he's installing a new door, but in fact he's found an as-new door on the side of the road and passes it off as new. Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics should still deem this decision neutral, right?
Would appreciate if any of you could provide some clarity!... Though, I have a feeling it may just pull me further into the philosophical black hole.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5787
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
Fascinating.Scott wrote: ↑April 16th, 2019, 2:33 pm Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics don't deem anything morally good or immoral. They are categories of moral and ethical codes that describe what aspects the various differing disagreeing codes in that category consider when determines the morality of something such as action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue. Two moral codes in the same category might disagree about whether a specific action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue is immoral, morally good, or neutral.
I love it when Scott explains these things for us in plain English.
Thank you Scott.
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: March 27th, 2011, 8:03 am
Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: March 27th, 2011, 8:03 am
Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023