The March Philosophy Book of the Month is Final Notice by Van Fleisher. Discuss Final Notice now.

The April Philosophy Book of the Month is The Unbound Soul by Richard L. Haight. Discuss The Unbound Soul Now

The May Philosophy Book of the Month is Misreading Judas by Robert Wahler.

Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
Post Reply
User avatar
tingless
New Trial Member
Posts: 1
Joined: April 6th, 2019, 6:03 am

Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Post by tingless » April 6th, 2019, 6:16 am

Hi all, first post! I've just taken a brief ethics course and have subsequently fallen into the rabbit hole. I hope to get a lot out of participation in this forum.

I'm trying to understand deontology vs. consequentialism vs. virtue ethics and I'm trying to figure out whether I'm understanding this right.

Here's the example I'm thinking of...

I engage a contractor to do a job and he does the job and everything is fine. Deontology, consequetionalism and virtue ethics say that whether I engage the contractor or not is morally neutral.

Now, same situation as above... except I find out that the contractor (a) cheats on his taxes, or (b) doesn't pay his workers, or (c) uses stolen goods in his work. Now that I know that his work is not above board, does that change the ethics of choosing to engage him? Does the extent to which he's not above board effect the decision? So where I'm stuck is that it seems wrong to engage him... but why?

What if: (d) he says that he's installing a new door, but in fact he's found an as-new door on the side of the road and passes it off as new. Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics should still deem this decision neutral, right?

Would appreciate if any of you could provide some clarity!... Though, I have a feeling it may just pull me further into the philosophical black hole. :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 4323
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic
Contact:

Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Post by Scott » April 16th, 2019, 2:33 pm

Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics don't deem anything morally good or immoral. They are categories of moral and ethical codes that describe what aspects the various differing disagreeing codes in that category consider when determines the morality of something such as action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue. Two moral codes in the same category might disagree about whether a specific action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue is immoral, morally good, or neutral.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

User avatar
h_k_s
Posts: 671
Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Post by h_k_s » April 17th, 2019, 3:43 pm

Scott wrote:
April 16th, 2019, 2:33 pm
Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics don't deem anything morally good or immoral. They are categories of moral and ethical codes that describe what aspects the various differing disagreeing codes in that category consider when determines the morality of something such as action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue. Two moral codes in the same category might disagree about whether a specific action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue is immoral, morally good, or neutral.
Fascinating.

I love it when Scott explains these things for us in plain English.

Thank you Scott.

Alan Masterman
Posts: 66
Joined: March 27th, 2011, 8:03 am

Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Post by Alan Masterman » May 15th, 2019, 10:35 pm

Conswuentialism or Utilitarianism would decree that if you can't tell the door from a new one then the outcome is good. If the contractor found the door by the side of the road, then the good is compounded. Both parties profit.

Alan Masterman
Posts: 66
Joined: March 27th, 2011, 8:03 am

Re: Trying to understand deontology and consequentialism

Post by Alan Masterman » May 15th, 2019, 10:37 pm

Please explain what you mean by "virtue ethics".

Post Reply