Objective vs Subjective Truth

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"). Those kind of questions can be asked in the off-topic section.
Post Reply
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 16th, 2019, 4:17 pm
Todd wrote: March 31st, 2019, 8:12 pm I'm writing a blog post exploring whether the idea of objective truth (defined below) is a valid and useful concept.
It would be most useful to recognize that all truth is bound to the subject. In as much as all truthful statements have to be recognized and identified by a human subject.
All claims that such truths have any kind of objective quality requires certain things to be agreed upon by those that apprehend the statements. |Thus any claims made must also be examined in reference to agreed parameters. Such parameters cannot avoid cultural and historical definition and are therefore relative to the those factors.

Here's an example:
10 people suck on a lemon. Some say that the lemon is sour, some that it is sweeter than normal, others say it is typically sour of lemons generally.
A scientist comes along hoping to determine the objective truth of the degree of sourness of the lemon. After a few moments, and with the help of a machine, the scientist declares the lemon to have a sourness factor of 7.56.
The 10 people rely on their experience of lemons, but that makes their results subjective. The question is whether or not the machine is any better. It uses data which has been gathered on lemons, so the claim is that the result is better and more objective than the humans. But surely the data itself is machine subjective and relies on the arbitrary experimental selection of the lemons it has been 'fed'.
You're confusing objective/subjective with absolute/relative. While the only "absolute" truths are tautologies, an objective truth is one for which the truth conditions for the proposition asserting it are public, i.e., verifiable by any suitably situated observer. A subjective truth is one whose truth conditions are private, accessible only to the speaker.

"This lemon is sour" is an objective proposition. It means the juice of the lemon has a high acid content. That fact is verifiable by anyone who either tastes or analyzes the juice.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Consul »

GE Morton wrote: May 17th, 2019, 9:43 amYou're confusing objective/subjective with absolute/relative. While the only "absolute" truths are tautologies, an objective truth is one for which the truth conditions for the proposition asserting it are public, i.e., verifiable by any suitably situated observer. A subjective truth is one whose truth conditions are private, accessible only to the speaker.
An introspective truth about a private experience is an epistemically objective truth about something ontically subjective.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7089
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Sculptor1 »

GE Morton wrote: May 17th, 2019, 9:43 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 16th, 2019, 4:17 pm

It would be most useful to recognize that all truth is bound to the subject. In as much as all truthful statements have to be recognized and identified by a human subject.
All claims that such truths have any kind of objective quality requires certain things to be agreed upon by those that apprehend the statements. |Thus any claims made must also be examined in reference to agreed parameters. Such parameters cannot avoid cultural and historical definition and are therefore relative to the those factors.

Here's an example:
10 people suck on a lemon. Some say that the lemon is sour, some that it is sweeter than normal, others say it is typically sour of lemons generally.
A scientist comes along hoping to determine the objective truth of the degree of sourness of the lemon. After a few moments, and with the help of a machine, the scientist declares the lemon to have a sourness factor of 7.56.
The 10 people rely on their experience of lemons, but that makes their results subjective. The question is whether or not the machine is any better. It uses data which has been gathered on lemons, so the claim is that the result is better and more objective than the humans. But surely the data itself is machine subjective and relies on the arbitrary experimental selection of the lemons it has been 'fed'.
You're confusing objective/subjective with absolute/relative. While the only "absolute" truths are tautologies, an objective truth is one for which the truth conditions for the proposition asserting it are public, i.e., verifiable by any suitably situated observer. A subjective truth is one whose truth conditions are private, accessible only to the speaker.

"This lemon is sour" is an objective proposition.
And yet it can be false
...It means the juice of the lemon has a high acid content.
Nope... "high" is a value judgment
That fact is verifiable by anyone who either tastes or analyzes the juice.
Not at all. Who is "anyone"?
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 18th, 2019, 1:44 pm
"This lemon is sour" is an objective proposition.
And yet it can be false
Of course. An objective proposition may be either true or false. E.g., "San Francisco is the capital of the US" is objectively false.
...It means the juice of the lemon has a high acid content.
Nope... "high" is a value judgment
No. it isn't. It means the acid content is high relative to other foods, or perhaps high relative to other lemons. No values are involved.
That fact is verifiable by anyone who either tastes or analyzes the juice.
Not at all. Who is "anyone"?
The answer is given in the statement.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Consul wrote: May 17th, 2019, 12:57 pm
GE Morton wrote: May 17th, 2019, 9:43 amYou're confusing objective/subjective with absolute/relative. While the only "absolute" truths are tautologies, an objective truth is one for which the truth conditions for the proposition asserting it are public, i.e., verifiable by any suitably situated observer. A subjective truth is one whose truth conditions are private, accessible only to the speaker.
An introspective truth about a private experience is an epistemically objective truth about something ontically subjective.
We've covered this. Searle's "epistemically/ontically" analysis is vacuous.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Consul »

GE Morton wrote: May 18th, 2019, 10:53 pmWe've covered this. Searle's "epistemically/ontically" analysis is vacuous.
No, it's not.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7089
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Sculptor1 »

GE Morton wrote: May 18th, 2019, 10:49 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 18th, 2019, 1:44 pm
And yet it can be false
Of course. An objective proposition may be either true or false. E.g., "San Francisco is the capital of the US" is objectively false.
Nope... "high" is a value judgment
No. it isn't. It means the acid content is high relative to other foods, or perhaps high relative to other lemons. No values are involved.
Not at all. Who is "anyone"?
The answer is given in the statement.
HIGH is a value judgment.
WHo is anyone?
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7089
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Sculptor1 »

GE Morton wrote: May 18th, 2019, 10:49 pm
No. it isn't. It means the acid content is high relative to other foods, or perhaps high relative to other lemons. No values are involved.

LOL.
You mean an objective statement is relative?
User avatar
Present awareness
Posts: 1389
Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Present awareness »

Todd wrote: March 31st, 2019, 8:12 pm I'm writing a blog post exploring whether the idea of objective truth (defined below) is a valid and useful concept.

What do you think? I believe objective truth to be important and useful, but I'm having a hard time explaining why. What are the philosophical arguments for and against this idea?

Objective Truth defined: no matter what we believe to be the case, some things will always be true, and other things will always be false. Our beliefs, whatever they are, have no bearing on the facts of the world around us. That which is true is always true — even if we stop believing it and even if we stop existing at all.

It seems an implied debate about objective vs. subjective truth underlies much of public discourse in political and cultural areas. Some advocate subjectivism - arguing for subjective truth and criticize the validity of things like reason, science, logic, etc. These arguments seem to align with Postmodern Philosophy.

Others subscribe to a more Modern world view which upholds the importance of objective truth, science, etc and the inherent logic and predictability in the world around us.
It has been estimated that objectively, the Earth rotates roughly 1000 miles an hour at the equator, but if we stand there, we do not subjectively feel this rotation. Subjectively, the Sun moves across the sky but objectively it is the Earth that is moving. Objectively, the Earth is a globe but subjectively it looks flat. What we often experience subjectively does not always correlate with what is actually happening. Even though these things have been estimated to be going on for billions of years, it will not continue forever. The Sun will die and in it’s death, will ingulf the Earth, reducing Earth to a torched lifeless rock.
The conclusion is the nothing is permanent and perhaps that is the only real objective truth!
Even though you can see me, I might not be here.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 19th, 2019, 5:47 am
LOL.
You mean an objective statement is relative?
It can be, yes. The absolute/relative dichotomy is is unrelated to the subjective/objective dichotomy. "George is six feet tall" and "George is taller than John" are both objective.
User avatar
Arjen
Posts: 467
Joined: January 16th, 2019, 4:53 am
Favorite Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Arjen »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 16th, 2019, 4:17 pm It would be most useful to recognize that all truth is bound to the subject. In as much as all truthful statements have to be recognized and identified by a human subject.
That is exactly the point.

During the period known as 'enlightenment' rationalism was set out agai st empiricism. Empiricism being information derived by observation. Rationalism being information derived by tje ratio.

I humbly submit that a correct thought is derived from 2 premisses. One subjective concerning the object being an observation. One objective concerning universal categories relating to the observed object. So, the ratio is neccessarily objective.

By properly analysing and discussing things, we can arrive at intersubjective truths, because the ratio is the same in every being. Some suggest that there is only 1 ratio, within which everything exists (Christianity in Greek tradition for example) or that is quantified into all things (Christianity in Latin tradition for example).

:)
The saying that what is true in theory is not always true in practice, means that the theory is wrong!
~Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7089
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Sculptor1 »

GE Morton wrote: May 21st, 2019, 10:32 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 19th, 2019, 5:47 am
LOL.
You mean an objective statement is relative?
It can be, yes. The absolute/relative dichotomy is is unrelated to the subjective/objective dichotomy. "George is six feet tall" and "George is taller than John" are both objective.
Avoid hyperbole. It is NOT unrelated. If it were unrelated there would be no such thing as a relative objective statement.
BTW "George is taller than John" is not relative. It is comparative.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7089
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by Sculptor1 »

Arjen wrote: May 23rd, 2019, 1:59 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 16th, 2019, 4:17 pm It would be most useful to recognize that all truth is bound to the subject. In as much as all truthful statements have to be recognized and identified by a human subject.
That is exactly the point.

During the period known as 'enlightenment' rationalism was set out agai st empiricism. Empiricism being information derived by observation. Rationalism being information derived by tje ratio.

I humbly submit that a correct thought is derived from 2 premisses. One subjective concerning the object being an observation. One objective concerning universal categories relating to the observed object. So, the ratio is neccessarily objective.

By properly analysing and discussing things, we can arrive at intersubjective truths, because the ratio is the same in every being. Some suggest that there is only 1 ratio, within which everything exists (Christianity in Greek tradition for example) or that is quantified into all things (Christianity in Latin tradition for example).

:)
What people claim for "objectivity" often outweighs the truth that such statements are limited to "intersubjectivity". Sadly when people claim objectivity they are usually trying to assert an absolute and universal fact, disinterested and devoid of subject - this is absurd.

Something as banal as "murder is wrong" is not devoid of subject or relationship. At best it is a tautology. But cannot be absolute or universal.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 23rd, 2019, 5:25 pm
GE Morton wrote: May 21st, 2019, 10:32 am

It can be, yes. The absolute/relative dichotomy is is unrelated to the subjective/objective dichotomy. "George is six feet tall" and "George is taller than John" are both objective.
Avoid hyperbole. It is NOT unrelated. If it were unrelated there would be no such thing as a relative objective statement.
Er, no. Two adjectives need not denote related properties in order for both to apply to some subject. The point was that "objective" does not mean, or imply, "absolute," though it is often used as though it does.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Objective vs Subjective Truth

Post by GE Morton »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 23rd, 2019, 5:28 pm
Something as banal as "murder is wrong" is not devoid of subject or relationship. At best it is a tautology. But cannot be absolute or universal.
If it is a tautology (which it is) it is necessarily absolute. Tautologies are the only propositions absolutely true.
Post Reply

Return to “General Philosophy”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021