Infinite monkey theorem
- green1
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: January 12th, 2020, 6:39 am
Infinite monkey theorem
https://en.m.wikipedia. org/wiki/Infinite_Monkey_theorem
The infinite monkey theorem suggests that there is no need for God for an intelligent design. A monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
Thanks,
green1
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Your link did not work.green1 wrote: ↑January 12th, 2020, 7:01 am Hi all,
https://en.m.wikipedia. org/wiki/Infinite_Monkey_theorem
The infinite monkey theorem suggests that there is no need for God for an intelligent design. A monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
Thanks,
green1
Here is the true link:
https://theinfinitemonkeytheorem.com/
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
If this is the only thing that you are basing your atheist faith upon, then I would say, get ready to roast in Lucifer's BBQ Palace someday soon.green1 wrote: ↑January 12th, 2020, 7:01 am Hi all,
https://en.m.wikipedia. org/wiki/Infinite_Monkey_theorem
The infinite monkey theorem suggests that there is no need for God for an intelligent design. A monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.
How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
Thanks,
green1
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
You'd have to say instead, "Something that's interpreted as intelligent design."
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
While you're at it, ask him (or her) when he's going to stop beating his wife.h_k_s wrote:If this is the only thing that you are basing your atheist faith upon...
Hi green1. Is the implication of this question that there would need to be some form of intelligence deciding when the monkeys can stop? If so, then I guess the point would be that the infinite monkey thought experiment doesn't really work because there still needs to be an intelligence to, as it were, pluck order from the randomness?green1 wrote:How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Suggesting that the universe works at all like a random selection process operating for an arbitrarily long period of time would need to be justified, though.
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Steve3007 there is plenty of room for more permanent residents in Lucifer's Hot BBQ Palace.Steve3007 wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 8:36 amWhile you're at it, ask him (or her) when he's going to stop beating his wife.h_k_s wrote:If this is the only thing that you are basing your atheist faith upon...
Hi green1. Is the implication of this question that there would need to be some form of intelligence deciding when the monkeys can stop? If so, then I guess the point would be that the infinite monkey thought experiment doesn't really work because there still needs to be an intelligence to, as it were, pluck order from the randomness?green1 wrote:How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
Hell ain't half-full yet.
- chewybrian
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: May 9th, 2018, 7:17 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus
- Location: Florida man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Isn't that the theory of natural selection in a nutshell?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 9:02 am The monkey thing is just a colorful way to note the idea that if you have something continually generating sets of letters (and spaces, etc.) randomly, of random lengths, then over a arbitrarily long period of time, where there's no time limit to it, that process will (re)produce every bit of writing that has ever been produced by humans.
Suggesting that the universe works at all like a random selection process operating for an arbitrarily long period of time would need to be justified, though.
You can extend it to behavioral therapy if you wish and use it to define learning and behavior in all animals and people. In theory, say from Thorndike or Skinner, we simply try random or previously learned behaviors against new problems until something generates a result we like (See also: Pavlov, Wolpe, Watson, Cover Jones). We, arguably, simply chain these learned behaviors together into complex behaviors to complete complex tasks. A case can be made that it all works back to positive and negative reinforcement of random attempts at some point, before we learned that something could get us what we wanted.
We also make some wild mistakes along the way through confusing correlation with cause and effect. When delivered food at random intervals, Skinner's pigeons would often assume, incorrectly, that their behavior had resulted in a food delivery, and repeat the behavior around in hopes of getting more food.
So, long story short, the suggestion you described is not the most absurd way of understanding the universe by any means. You can apply it to living things and find a decent match, though I don't think it tells the whole story. If you only mean to look at inert stuff, you can still find some apparent randomness if the system in view is complex enough, like weather, or at the subatomic level, perhaps.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
. I'll mind my language then.h_k_s wrote:@Steve3007 there is plenty of room for more permanent residents in Lucifer's Hot BBQ Palace.
- green1
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: January 12th, 2020, 6:39 am
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Yes. This is what I mean.Steve3007 wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 8:36 amWhile you're at it, ask him (or her) when he's going to stop beating his wife.h_k_s wrote:If this is the only thing that you are basing your atheist faith upon...
Hi green1. Is the implication of this question that there would need to be some form of intelligence deciding when the monkeys can stop? If so, then I guess the point would be that the infinite monkey thought experiment doesn't really work because there still needs to be an intelligence to, as it were, pluck order from the randomness?green1 wrote:How the monkey knows where to stop? How the monkey concludes that the design is coherent, meaningful and beautiful enough, and stops typing and preserves the final design?
Thank you all for your comments.
green1
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
No. As folks will all too readily bring up in free will discussions, science doesn't routinely posit that any phenomena are random, and most free will denied insist that led science nothing whatsoever is really random.chewybrian wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 10:00 am
Isn't that the theory of natural selection in a nutshell?
Quantum phenomena are usually suggested as the exception, but even quantum phenomena don't tend to be equiprobably random.
The monkeys typing Shakespeare idea is about randomness. If we're not talking about random selection there's no reason to believe the monkeys will ever arrive at Shakespeare.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
"Most free will denied" above should read "most free will deniers."
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
Some of these are auto"correction" problems by my kindle.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Infinite monkey theorem
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023