Jantelaw
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Jantelaw
What is the Law of Jante?
You’re not to think you are anything special.
You’re not to think you are as good as we are.
You’re not to think you are smarter than we are.
You’re not to convince yourself that you are better than we are.
You’re not to think you know more than we do.
You’re not to think you are more important than we are.
You’re not to think you are good at anything.
You’re not to laugh at us.
You’re not to think anyone cares about you.
You’re not to think you can teach us anything.
Of a general philosophical interest, or so it seems to this philosophile, is the notion of "national character" -- a notion entirely out of step with the times in this muddleheaded 21st century and politically incorrect -- two reasons to revive the notion, or so it seems to this disaffected citizen of a nation once again divided ahainst itself. The Global Village, after all, is the new totalizing political bromide. And narcissism is the passport to happiness. This is the world order according to social media. A lot of hooey, if you ask me.
So if you don't know what the law of Jante, or Jantelaw, is, perhaps you ought to find out. (The links below are provided for your edification.)
The, as it were, 10 Commandments of Jante are listed above. They demand thoughtful consideration from those who, like your disaffected host, are fed up to the gills with Millennial Egoism.
What do you think of Jantelaw as a character model?
What do you think of Jantelaw as an answer to rampant ego-centric individualism?
Would the world be a better place if Jantelaw were the rule rather than the fading oddity it is?
How would you defend Jantelaw philosophical;y?
How would you refute Jantelaw philosophical;y?
Do you think you're something special? Wny?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante
https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/201 ... -of-jante/
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Jantelaw
'You are not to take personal responsibility for making decisions.'
If we don't take personal responsibility for making decisions some power hungry idiots will make them for us.
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Re: Jantelaw
I don't see the absence of personal responsibility in Jantelaw, Belindi -- but I'm quite open to being made to see it if you care to elaborate on this theme. I do see the absence of personal pride, but I don't see how absence of responsibility follows from that. As for collectivism being more vulnerable to political power than individualism, this too needs at least another explanatory sentence or two as my intuition tells me that suppression of the collective would be a more formidable task than the suppression of individuals. But again I welcome your instruction on these points. Thanks for breaking the ice.Belindi wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 5:28 am I disapprove of Jantelaw because the theme that runs through all the items is
'You are not to take personal responsibility for making decisions.'
If we don't take personal responsibility for making decisions some power hungry idiots will make them for us.
- Marvin_Edwards
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: April 14th, 2020, 9:34 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Contact:
Re: Jantelaw
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Re: Jantelaw
I think you've picked up on the spirit of Jantelaw, Mr Edwards. Why do you find it "grotesque"? This is a question, not a challenge. I'm sincerely interested in your reaction.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 1:16 pm Sounds a bit grotesque to me. Reminds me of the early communist parties of the USSR and China.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: January 31st, 2020, 10:41 am
Re: Jantelaw
For what it is worth, I think a healthy society should show a balance between the conformity and mutual respect that makes social cohesion possible and provides a counter the overweening arrogance, greed and selfishness that most of us seem capable of, a balance between that and the personal independence that allows for individual expression, innovation, spontaneity and creativity which is also socially useful and which allows for personal freedoms that we by and large desire. Jante Law is too conformist for my liking, seems stifling in fact, though what I like, is, I recognise, not free from cultural influence.
- hgvafonso
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: September 3rd, 2020, 4:05 pm
Re: Jantelaw
2. Every individual bares the purpose of life
3. The environment dictates, in part, the faith of every living individual
4. The individual understands that the environment influences it´s faith
5. Every individual, as per 1 and 2, puts effort on molding the environment to be favourable
6. There is strength in numbers (ants and all insects)
7. The secret of life is the differences: it tries all, so if the environment changes, chances are that something will endure.
8. The Jantlaw are just another oral construct, to ensure that individuals keep the same
9. The Jantlaw serves people who live in cold places, with long winters and need the advantage of numbers in order to survive
10. I like to enjoy myself
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Jantelaw
Yes.
Because nominalism has things right.
Why?
Aside from that, obviously some people are smarter, more knowledgeable, etc. than others.
I'm also not at all a fan of humor taboos.
That sounds like a prescription for participation trophy culture, with a side dish of being easily offendable due to insecurities.
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Re: Jantelaw
Welcome aboard, 'fonso!hgvafonso wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 4:41 pm 1. The purpose of life is to live, to prosper, eternaly: by passing genes or becoming imortal.
2. Every individual bares the purpose of life
3. The environment dictates, in part, the faith of every living individual
4. The individual understands that the environment influences it´s faith
5. Every individual, as per 1 and 2, puts effort on molding the environment to be favourable
6. There is strength in numbers (ants and all insects)
7. The secret of life is the differences: it tries all, so if the environment changes, chances are that something will endure.
8. The Jantlaw are just another oral construct, to ensure that individuals keep the same
9. The Jantlaw serves people who live in cold places, with long winters and need the advantage of numbers in order to survive
10. I like to enjoy myself
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Re: Jantelaw
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 5:27 pmYes.
Because nominalism has things right.
Why?
- Angel Trismegistus
- Posts: 568
- Joined: July 25th, 2020, 1:19 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Location: New York City
Re: Jantelaw
Would you say your balance is achieved in any contemporary instance?Wossname wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 4:14 pm Thanks for this. I had never heard of this before your post. I have only had time to look at the Wiki entry.
For what it is worth, I think a healthy society should show a balance between the conformity and mutual respect that makes social cohesion possible and provides a counter the overweening arrogance, greed and selfishness that most of us seem capable of, a balance between that and the personal independence that allows for individual expression, innovation, spontaneity and creativity which is also socially useful and which allows for personal freedoms that we by and large desire. Jante Law is too conformist for my liking, seems stifling in fact, though what I like, is, I recognise, not free from cultural influence.
What connection do you see, if any, between "personal independence" and "overweening arrogance, greed and selfishness"?
What don't you like about conformity?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Jantelaw
Because each and every item tends to disempower the individual. Pride in oneself is empowering for good and for evil. Either I decide for myself (as well as I can) what is good and what is evil, or some bigwig will decide for me.Angel Trismegistus wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 11:47 amI don't see the absence of personal responsibility in Jantelaw, Belindi -- but I'm quite open to being made to see it if you care to elaborate on this theme. I do see the absence of personal pride, but I don't see how absence of responsibility follows from that. As for collectivism being more vulnerable to political power than individualism, this too needs at least another explanatory sentence or two as my intuition tells me that suppression of the collective would be a more formidable task than the suppression of individuals. But again I welcome your instruction on these points. Thanks for breaking the ice.Belindi wrote: ↑September 3rd, 2020, 5:28 am I disapprove of Jantelaw because the theme that runs through all the items is
'You are not to take personal responsibility for making decisions.'
If we don't take personal responsibility for making decisions some power hungry idiots will make them for us.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7089
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Jantelaw
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7089
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Jantelaw
― Jiddu Krishnamurti
Were people to embrace this the world would be a better place.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7089
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Jantelaw
Like the Riech.
Each has his own though.2. Every individual bares the purpose of life
Really?3. The environment dictates, in part, the faith of every living individual.
Faith is the the result of a dead, closed mind.4. The individual understands that the environment influences it´s faith
Jawohl5. Every individual, as per 1 and 2, puts effort on molding the environment to be favourable.
jawohl.6. There is strength in numbers (ants and all insects)
Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Führer
Ya, for a THOUSAND YEARS!7. The secret of life is the differences: it tries all, so if the environment changes, chances are that something will endure.
Same.... (what?)8. The Jantlaw are just another oral construct, to ensure that individuals keep the same
... And crush your enemies before you, relishing the lamentation of their women?9. The Jantlaw serves people who live in cold places, with long winters and need the advantage of numbers in order to survive
10. I like to enjoy myself
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023