If Murdoch and his clan are a wolf violently eating one leg of the lamb, Zuckerberg's Facebook is a second wolf tearing at a second leg of the lamb, and the Australian government is a third wolf violently tearing at third leg of the same lamb, then I am not sure if there is any value, or even much meaning, in figuring out who is right or whatnot in a fight between the wolves over the innocent lamb's legs.
While I wouldn't literally suggest guillotining them or anyone on account my preference for and advocacy of peace, I can at least figuratively agree eagerly with the sentiment.Pattern-chaser wrote:Any way that we can reduce their influence is OK with me. Guillotines were found to be very useful, a little while ago, in France....
Well, when you put it like that, then I guess I have to hold my nose and take Facebook's side on this one.Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 19th, 2021, 7:41 am Arguably an analogous situation would be a poster on here posting a link to a news article and, as a result, Scott (the owner of this website) having to pay the news provider being linked to. It seems clear that if the news provider hasn't put their article behind a paywall then they should be ok with people reading it, and any advertising that they put alongside it, for free.