What Now? with the Pandemic
-
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm
What Now? with the Pandemic
First let me answer the titled question. I am not optimistic, at least in the short and medium term. Again, that is an understatement. Even with hindsight, I am not about to state that governmental safety network for those stricken by the pandemic is out of bound or outrageous. It is urgent to react according to the circumstance. Emergency does not allow time for cool consideration.
I am more concerned about what we should do next. Some school may advocate continuing printing money to distribute to those in need, as long as the distribution is fair and fast. I believe we are already living beyond our means, in borrowed time, with the borrower being us in the future, or more likely, our future generation. It sure is easy to borrow from someone who cannot say No, and who do not have the vote. Should we bite the bullet now, so to speak, and exercise discipline to endure on what is due, and suffer the consequence, even though that consequence is unfairly casted on us? The good side is that if we can scrap through the debacle, at least we would have learned a lesson. Call it triumph of our civilization. We should feel proud, but it is more than that, of course. The bad side is the casually we have to face immediately, but in the end, it probably does not make difference either way as long as the casualty is concerned.
No question about that. Pay with what is in the wallet, or borrow now and pay later, hopefully not by us.
- JackDaydream
- Posts: 3288
- Joined: July 25th, 2021, 5:16 pm
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
I did create a thread on this topic and I was hoping that it would link the personal with the wider issues of what comes next. But, my thread fizzled after about 2 days. But, I do wonder to what extent at all the pandemic has woken people up to to social and global issues.
It has definitely meant that more people are thrown into poverty. I have never seen as many people living on the streets in London(and my hometown Bedford). It seems that some people care about what is happening while others are so caught up in their everyday lives, especially if there lives are fairly secure. Everyone is able to catch the virus but some are more likely to fair better. Those with money are able to isolate in luxury whereas some in overcrowded conditions and with difficulties in life circumstances may have a lot more hardships in the process.
The problem is that the pandemic is far from over. In England many people had their 3rd vaccine and there is still big fear that lockdowns may be on the way. I remember in the first lockdown in summer 2020 a friend saying that it would be all forgotten by Christmas. The complete opposite happened with a lockdown straight after Christmas when lasted until spring. Even now, many aspects of life have not resumed, such as face to face GP appointments. Potentially, with the many new variants it could go on for years and years. How are people going to survive? Indeed, what comes next and I do link it with the need to look at Mr Climate Change because it is about disaster management and the entire issue of the future of humanity.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: July 19th, 2021, 11:08 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
What the world concers most is discussed up and down in all media (internet, TV, newspaper). There is no opinion about it that hasn't already been uttered hundreds of times by many different people. Why on earth should this forum that is dedicated to philosophy be polluted with the same thematic cacophony of irrelevant ungrounded opinions?
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7148
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
They govern under the direction of temporary tyrrants who are locked in to unfulfilable promises made during the election cycle.
Whilst most of these promises never get to policy they underlie the day to day modifications demanded by the gutter press which is controled by a handful of billionares, who have the power of life and death of those tyrrants.
COP was a performance act and will achieve little or nothing.
Vaccination strategies are designed to jab the rich nations whilst leaving the rest of the world as fertile grounds for the virus to continue to mutate.
Things are bad.
- Empiricist-Bruno
- Moderator
- Posts: 585
- Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:52 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Berkeley
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
The Covid vaccine is the product of enormous and useless animal cruelty. Given this fact, I wonder who would think it could possibly be used to achieve commendable goals.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 24th, 2021, 6:52 pm Technocrats serving the demogogic economists are who govern.
They govern under the direction of temporary tyrrants who are locked in to unfulfilable promises made during the election cycle.
Whilst most of these promises never get to policy they underlie the day to day modifications demanded by the gutter press which is controled by a handful of billionares, who have the power of life and death of those tyrrants.
COP was a performance act and will achieve little or nothing.
Vaccination strategies are designed to jab the rich nations whilst leaving the rest of the world as fertile grounds for the virus to continue to mutate.
Things are bad.
- Empiricist-Bruno
- Moderator
- Posts: 585
- Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:52 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Berkeley
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
We're also familiar with cockroaches and bed bugs in homes. So, why not just welcome this latest newcomer? Who do you work for?LuckyR wrote: ↑December 20th, 2021, 4:38 am Several things. First, what made Covid such a big deal in 2020 was that at first no one was immune to it (as opposed to being inherently virulent). At this point, most people have either recovered from a bout with it or have been vaccinated. There are enough who have done neither to keep a certain number of people in the hospital and dying, but that is a shrinking minority, instead of 100% of all people 2 years ago. We just need to get to the point that Covid is another "version" of the flu ie. it makes you miss some work if you get it but are otherwise healthy and it kills tens of thousands of already sickly people every year and you get vaccinated every year. We're familiar with that.
- Empiricist-Bruno
- Moderator
- Posts: 585
- Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:52 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Berkeley
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
My biggest concern is the inequality and division this disease has helped to highlight. Billionaires have made money from this pandemic. I think the vast majority of people don't understand the root cause of the disease because otherwise a product of animal cruelty (the COVID-19 vaccine) would be widely rejected as a potential solution to the problem, and planes would not be allowed to fly.gad-fly wrote: ↑December 19th, 2021, 4:56 pm
First let me answer the titled question. I am not optimistic, at least in the short and medium term. Again, that is an understatement. Even with hindsight, I am not about to state that governmental safety network for those stricken by the pandemic is out of bound or outrageous. It is urgent to react according to the circumstance. Emergency does not allow time for cool consideration.
I am more concerned about what we should do next. Some school may advocate continuing printing money to distribute to those in need, as long as the distribution is fair and fast. I believe we are already living beyond our means, in borrowed time, with the borrower being us in the future, or more likely, our future generation. It sure is easy to borrow from someone who cannot say No, and who do not have the vote. Should we bite the bullet now, so to speak, and exercise discipline to endure on what is due, and suffer the consequence, even though that consequence is unfairly casted on us? The good side is that if we can scrap through the debacle, at least we would have learned a lesson. Call it triumph of our civilization. We should feel proud, but it is more than that, of course. The bad side is the casually we have to face immediately, but in the end, it probably does not make difference either way as long as the casualty is concerned.
No question about that. Pay with what is in the wallet, or borrow now and pay later, hopefully not by us.
So, I think things will get much worse and fundamental changes will need to be made to society and in the hearts of most people before you can produce a population that is able to deal effectively with this.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7148
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
Is it? Please cite!Empiricist-Bruno wrote: ↑December 26th, 2021, 9:53 amThe Covid vaccine is the product of enormous and useless animal cruelty.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 24th, 2021, 6:52 pm Technocrats serving the demogogic economists are who govern.
They govern under the direction of temporary tyrrants who are locked in to unfulfilable promises made during the election cycle.
Whilst most of these promises never get to policy they underlie the day to day modifications demanded by the gutter press which is controled by a handful of billionares, who have the power of life and death of those tyrrants.
COP was a performance act and will achieve little or nothing.
Vaccination strategies are designed to jab the rich nations whilst leaving the rest of the world as fertile grounds for the virus to continue to mutate.
Things are bad.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
"Welcoming" has nothing to do with it. Viruses are going to do what they are going to do, regardless of your personal feelings about them.Empiricist-Bruno wrote: ↑December 26th, 2021, 9:59 amWe're also familiar with cockroaches and bed bugs in homes. So, why not just welcome this latest newcomer? Who do you work for?LuckyR wrote: ↑December 20th, 2021, 4:38 am Several things. First, what made Covid such a big deal in 2020 was that at first no one was immune to it (as opposed to being inherently virulent). At this point, most people have either recovered from a bout with it or have been vaccinated. There are enough who have done neither to keep a certain number of people in the hospital and dying, but that is a shrinking minority, instead of 100% of all people 2 years ago. We just need to get to the point that Covid is another "version" of the flu ie. it makes you miss some work if you get it but are otherwise healthy and it kills tens of thousands of already sickly people every year and you get vaccinated every year. We're familiar with that.
I'm retired, who do you work for?
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7148
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
The Cambridge Astra zenica costs £1 per dose and is offered at cost.
The Pfizer vaccine costs £22 per dose and is not offered at cost.
Some are profiting, some are not.
-
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
The root cause? Epidemic comes and goes. Rarely, it turns pandemic before it goes. Once in a blue moon, beyond control. No pint to pass the buck.Empiricist-Bruno wrote: ↑December 26th, 2021, 10:12 am
My biggest concern is the inequality and division this disease has helped to highlight. Billionaires have made money from this pandemic. I think the vast majority of people don't understand the root cause of the disease because otherwise a product of animal cruelty (the COVID-19 vaccine) would be widely rejected as a potential solution to the problem, and planes would not be allowed to fly.
So, I think things will get much worse and fundamental changes will need to be made to society and in the hearts of most people before you can produce a population that is able to deal effectively with this.
Population to deal effectively with it? You mean the medical profession in the population? Vaccine is the only effective agent to deal with it.
What now? We are doing the best we can. What next? We learn our lesson, and we are better prepared.
- JackDaydream
- Posts: 3288
- Joined: July 25th, 2021, 5:16 pm
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
It is hard to know what comes next. There are so many ambiguities. In some places, it is hard to get any face to face interaction. But in other places people mingle freely.
It is even the same with climate change. Ecxcees or complete minimalism? How does one determine the consequences of each action and find the right balance? I know that you are in favour of thinking about climate change and I am not in disagreement. It is simply that each of us is trying to find a way forward daily; trying to juggle the odds, and our own footprints in the chains of causality.
It is not easy, even if one really cares. Emotional concerns about the wellbeing of others and the environment need to be met with rationality. Navigating all of this is complex.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
Not that hard. Omicron is the end of the pandemic. Highly contagious yet not that virulent. Thus everybody not otherwise immune can get mild disease, develop immunity that way, then everyone has some form of immunity and it basically becomes the flu: never goes away, kills tens of thousands of the vulnerable every year and there is an updated shot available every year. Been there, done that.JackDaydream wrote: ↑January 10th, 2022, 4:50 pm @ gad-fly
It is hard to know what comes next. There are so many ambiguities. In some places, it is hard to get any face to face interaction. But in other places people mingle freely.
It is even the same with climate change. Ecxcees or complete minimalism? How does one determine the consequences of each action and find the right balance? I know that you are in favour of thinking about climate change and I am not in disagreement. It is simply that each of us is trying to find a way forward daily; trying to juggle the odds, and our own footprints in the chains of causality.
It is not easy, even if one really cares. Emotional concerns about the wellbeing of others and the environment need to be met with rationality. Navigating all of this is complex.
- Empiricist-Bruno
- Moderator
- Posts: 585
- Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:52 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Berkeley
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: What Now? with the Pandemic
The future isn't always a repeat of the past. The current situation is unlike any that we had before.LuckyR wrote: ↑January 11th, 2022, 2:55 amNot that hard. Omicron is the end of the pandemic. Highly contagious yet not that virulent. Thus everybody not otherwise immune can get mild disease, develop immunity that way, then everyone has some form of immunity and it basically becomes the flu: never goes away, kills tens of thousands of the vulnerable every year and there is an updated shot available every year. Been there, done that.JackDaydream wrote: ↑January 10th, 2022, 4:50 pm @ gad-fly
It is hard to know what comes next. There are so many ambiguities. In some places, it is hard to get any face to face interaction. But in other places people mingle freely.
It is even the same with climate change. Ecxcees or complete minimalism? How does one determine the consequences of each action and find the right balance? I know that you are in favour of thinking about climate change and I am not in disagreement. It is simply that each of us is trying to find a way forward daily; trying to juggle the odds, and our own footprints in the chains of causality.
It is not easy, even if one really cares. Emotional concerns about the wellbeing of others and the environment need to be met with rationality. Navigating all of this is complex.
Few people would know and understand the things I am about to say but for those who do, the truth is a bit more bleak.
For those of you that understand biology in general, you are aware that any population of living species that reaches its sustainability limits becomes particularly vulnerable to epidemics. Unlike any species before us, we (well, some of us) understand the threat and can respond effectively to the challenge. However, the fact that nature attacks with epidemics the type of populations that have grown excessively doesn't imply that humans have realized the importance of sustainability and of controlling population growth.
No, we think we're just above this kind of scourge prepared by nature for the overpopulated areas.
As a result, we have kept increasing vaccination, which improved survival rates and so the human population over the past 50 years has become as dense as ever and this means that any successful virus able to defeat measures against it will be spreading like wildfire and because of all the transmission, there will be continuous mutations that will succeed in achieving their natural goal to control the population.
Even if the virus itself never kills too many people, it draws people in different camps (vaccinated or free of vaccine) and the fight that results of that (if it brings any casualty) should be considered as part of the virus' casualties too as it aims to reduce the population.
We have yet to fully realize what is going on, and the intellect needed to understand it means that this truth unvealed here is sure to remain under the radar of journalists, doctors, and politicians for some time to come.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023