If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you?
This forum is for discussing the book In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All. Anyone can view the forum and read the post, but only people who purchased the book can post in the forum.
If your purchase has not already been verified (i.e. if you don't already have access to post in this forum), then please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Very well clarified.
Considering the eternal fact about human existence, I don't agree to place 'Mind ' in the outer covering.
One's Mind is the link between soul and brain!
The concept of the core will be clear if we define core.
I am very satisfied to have some idea of ourselves.
I got from your say what I wanted to know about 'I' and ' you '.
I think I correctly wanted to have that clarification.
Now I can answer the original question!
: I will be still 'I' till my Soul and Mind is intact!
And I believe no one can change and transform one's Mind into other's .
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Sushan wrote: ↑December 30th, 2022, 7:55 pmThe whole concept is quite confusing. But in the book the author refers as one's self to the core that we all share, yet do not see because of the outer coverings comprised of our body, mind, clothes, etc. And it is said that that core is similar for every being. In that sense the changing of outer appearance (the outer covering) has nothing to do with one's real self. But the whole concept is not easy to grasp since we refer to our selves along with all these outer coverings.Dattatraya wrote: ↑December 30th, 2022, 10:01 amSushan wrote: ↑December 30th, 2022, 3:25 amI think there is. When we do it atom by atom there is subtlety. When things are subtle people do not feel the change. But if something done grossly and quickly, people tend to notice that even there is no change at all. So here the author might have wanted to exclude that error that I mentioned latter from the question. Otherwise the final result will have no difference whether you replace atom by atom or the whole subject at once.Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2022, 4:39 pm Would there be a difference in replacing every atom in turn rather than replacing the entire person at once?
Actually the original question is not clear!
........................ identical copy of my body, would you still be you
' would I still be I ' : By which way or considering what?
Also there will be no meaning for the question or answer if there is no reference.
Very well clarified.
Considering the eternal fact about human existence, I don't agree to place 'Mind ' in the outer covering.
One's Mind is the link between soul and brain!
The concept of the core will be clear if we define core.
I am very satisfied to have some idea of ourselves.
I got from your say what I wanted to know about 'I' and ' you '.
I think I correctly wanted to have that clarification.
Now I can answer the original question!
: I will be still 'I' till my Soul and Mind is intact!
And I believe no one can change and transform one's Mind into other's .
- Samantha Barnes 3
- Premium Member
- Posts: 20
- Joined: December 15th, 2022, 1:41 pm
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Scott wrote: ↑November 16th, 2022, 1:57 pm The below question is in a way simply a variation of the opening question of the book, worded very differently.
If over the next 30 years, your body (including your brain) very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body (including my brain), would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
Thank you for your reply!Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:08 pm I would still be me because I am shaped by my experiences and memories. Even if was identical to another person in every way, we would have completely different lives so we could not be each other.
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
I wouldn't say that I believe in "two selves".Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: ↑November 20th, 2022, 4:27 pm Also, how would Scott or anyone else who buys into the two-selves idea know that they are incorrect?
In other words, in terms of the infamous Mind-Body Problem, I am not a dualist.
Nonetheless, I do believe, as I pointed out in the book, that the English word 'you' (and by extension the English word 'me') is equivocal.
One of the things to which the word 'you' is often used to refer is something that I believe is an illusion. Moreover, I think science has demonstrated very convincingly that it doesn't really exist. In the book, I sometimes refer to it as "the false self" or "the unreal you". It's to that very point that I believe many scientists and philosophers refer when they say things like "the self is an illusion". Realizing or learning that it doesn't exist is what many people call "self-transcendence" or sometimes "ego death".
In regard to the topics of "ego death", "dying before you die", and "self-transcendence", as well as common claims along the lines of "the self is an illusion" or "continuous personal identity is an illusion", here is a quote from the neuroscientist Sam Harris that I love, which is transcribed from the Big Think video, entitled The Self is an Illusion:
Sam Harris wrote:I’m not arguing that consciousness is a reality beyond science or beyond the brain or that it floats free of the brain at death. I’m not making any spooky claims about its metaphysics. What I am saying, however, is that the self is an illusion. The sense of being an ego, an I, a thinker of thoughts in addition to the thoughts. An experiencer in addition to the experience. The sense that we all have of riding around inside our heads as a kind of a passenger in the vehicle of the body.
That’s where most people start when they think about any of these questions. Most people don’t feel identical to their bodies. They feel like they have bodies. They feel like they’re inside the body. And most people feel like they’re inside their heads. Now that sense of being a subject, a locus of consciousness inside the head is an illusion. It makes no neuro-anatomical sense. There’s no place in the brain for your ego to be hiding.
We know that everything you experience – your conscious emotions and thoughts and moods and the impulses that initiate behavior – all of these things are delivered by a myriad of different processes in the brain that are spread out over the whole of the brain. They can be independently erupted. We have a changing system. We are a process and there’s not one unitary self that’s carried through from one moment to the next unchanging.
And yet we feel that we have this self that’s just this center of experience.
Now it’s possible I claim and people have claimed for thousands of years to lose this feeling, to actually have the center drop out of the experience so that... you can just be identical to this sphere of experience that is all of the color and light and feeling and energy of consciousness. But there’s no sense of center there. So this is classically described as self-transcendence or ego transcendence in spiritual, mystical, new age religious literature. It is in large measure the baby in the bathwater that religious people are afraid to throw out. If you want to take seriously the project of being like Jesus or Buddha or some, you know, whatever your favorite contemplative is, self-transcendence really is at the core of the phenomenology that is described there. And what I’m saying is that it’s a real experience.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Samantha Barnes 3
- Premium Member
- Posts: 20
- Joined: December 15th, 2022, 1:41 pm
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
If I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.Scott wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 8:32 pmScott wrote: ↑November 16th, 2022, 1:57 pm The below question is in a way simply a variation of the opening question of the book, worded very differently.
If over the next 30 years, your body (including your brain) very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body (including my brain), would you still be you?
Would you also be me?Thank you for your reply!Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:08 pm I would still be me because I am shaped by my experiences and memories. Even if was identical to another person in every way, we would have completely different lives so we could not be each other.
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
The me from 2023 would no longer exist.Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:38 amIf I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.Scott wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 8:32 pmScott wrote: ↑November 16th, 2022, 1:57 pm The below question is in a way simply a variation of the opening question of the book, worded very differently.
If over the next 30 years, your body (including your brain) very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body (including my brain), would you still be you?
Would you also be me?Thank you for your reply!Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:08 pm I would still be me because I am shaped by my experiences and memories. Even if was identical to another person in every way, we would have completely different lives so we could not be each other.
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
I am having one query.
Where that me will go?
- Samantha Barnes 3
- Premium Member
- Posts: 20
- Joined: December 15th, 2022, 1:41 pm
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Dattatraya wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 12:34 pmThe me from 2023 would no longer exist.Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:38 amIf I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.Scott wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 8:32 pmScott wrote: ↑November 16th, 2022, 1:57 pm The below question is in a way simply a variation of the opening question of the book, worded very differently.
If over the next 30 years, your body (including your brain) very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body (including my brain), would you still be you?
Would you also be me?Thank you for your reply!Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:08 pm I would still be me because I am shaped by my experiences and memories. Even if was identical to another person in every way, we would have completely different lives so we could not be each other.
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
I am having one query.
Where that me will go?
The previous me never went anywhere, it was just replaced with something new. However, if I had no memory of the me before the change, then its existence would be forgotten like it was never there at all.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 12:48 pmDattatraya wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 12:34 pmThe me from 2023 would no longer exist.Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:38 amIf I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.Scott wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 8:32 pm
Thank you for your reply!
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
I am having one query.
Where that me will go?
The previous me never went anywhere, it was just replaced with something new. However, if I had no memory of the me before the change, then its existence would be forgotten like it was never there at all.
1: replacing means removing original and adding new!
2: when we are discussing ' I ' and ' you ' it is not possible that ' I ' had no memory.
Existence points to someone, either ' I ' or ' you '.
When You replaces I, I has to move out of the body!
Existence includes mind and soul!
And mind and soul are missing from the transformation process!
- Samantha Barnes 3
- Premium Member
- Posts: 20
- Joined: December 15th, 2022, 1:41 pm
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Dattatraya wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 1:36 pmSamantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 12:48 pmDattatraya wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 12:34 pmThe me from 2023 would no longer exist.Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:38 am
If I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.
I am having one query.
Where that me will go?
The previous me never went anywhere, it was just replaced with something new. However, if I had no memory of the me before the change, then its existence would be forgotten like it was never there at all.
1: replacing means removing original and adding new!
2: when we are discussing ' I ' and ' you ' it is not possible that ' I ' had no memory.
Existence points to someone, either ' I ' or ' you '.
When You replaces I, I has to move out of the body!
Existence includes mind and soul!
And mind and soul are missing from the transformation process!
This is fair. But isn't the soul shaped by past experiences? If the experiences that shaped you were no longer attainable, wouldn't your soul be changed as well? It still hasn't gone anywhere, you just wouldn't remember that it was ever there to begin with.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 7:08 pm I would still be me because I am shaped by my experiences and memories. Even if was identical to another person in every way, we would have completely different lives so we could not be each other.
Scott wrote: ↑January 26th, 2023, 8:32 pm Thank you for your reply!
The memories are stored in the brain, which is made of atoms. Once the atom-by-atom morphing is complete, you would have forgotten all of the memories you currently have now (in 2023), and you would then (in 2053) have all the memories that I currently have (in 2023).
So would you still be you?
Would you also be me?
Interesting, thank you for your answer!Samantha Barnes 3 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 9:38 am If I had all the memories that you have, then I would no longer be me. At that point, I would be you. The me from 2023 would no longer exist.
At what point would you stop being you and become me? Keep in mind, the morphing is happening very gradually over 30 years, so you would likely not notice a single difference from any one day to next. Halfway through the morphing, would you be you or me?
I am currently 36-years-old, and we can refer to this me writing this here and now as 36-year-old Scott. I don't have any of the same memories as 6-year-old Scott. And he had/has none of the ones I do now. Does that mean that I am not him?
What if instead of morphing into me over the next 30 years you lost all your memories through a severe case of amnesia, and then built 30-years worth of total new members? Would you not be you then?
In terms of the "Two Yous" as explained in the book, are you saying that both of the two yous would cease to exist if you slowly morphed into an atom-by-atom copy of me? Or are you saying one of the two yous would cease to exist and the other of the two yous would persist?
Sorry for all the questions! I love learning about different perspectives.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: January 17th, 2023, 5:44 pm
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
- Surabhi Rani
- Premium Member
- Posts: 90
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 3:21 am
Re: If your body very slowly and steadily morphed into an atom-by-atom identical copy of my body, would you still be you
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023