Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

Philosophy Discussion Forums
A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.

This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.


Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
#468850
LuckyR wrote: October 13th, 2024, 2:39 am Sounds like you're equating psychological warfare with bullying and labeling it intimidation. I agree there are degrees of overlap, but to my lexicon they're not identical.
Not identical, no, but isn't it clear that these three things, and presumably others too, have a lot in common? There are clear similarities or commonalities...?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468864
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:14 am
Sy Borg wrote: October 12th, 2024, 7:33 pm Consider all the ways that farmers can be inconsiderate and harsh towards animals, in ways that they could not if all parties were of comparable power.
In fairness (😯), farmers are captors, or jailers. This is intrinsically "inconsiderate and harsh towards animals", as far as the animals are concerned. The *role* of the farmer is antithetic to the welfare and wellbeing of their charges. We even disable them (removing horns, or putting nose-rings into bull's faces to control them) to prevent them from harming humans, and from resisting or escaping their captivity.

Is this bullying? I suppose it could be seen as so, but I think this 👆 goes way beyond bullying, don't you? We *own* and *use* the animals in our custody, then we execute and eat them. They live their lives, from birth to death, including breeding more victims, in controlled confinement. I'm not sure what the right word for it should be. Even slavery doesn't seem to go far enough. And "bullying" doesn't cover it, IMO.
No, you are completely off track. Farmers may or may not be bullies to the animals, just as bosses may bully or not bully their workers.

BTW, the word you are groping for is "predation".
User avatar
By LuckyR
#468869
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:05 am
LuckyR wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:44 pm
Sy Borg wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:18 pm Bullying is one strategy that may be employed in competition. It can also simply be sadistic. Chimps and dolphins are also capable of sadism.
Huh? Those who compete seek to win. That's normal. It's baked into the nature of competition. As is seeking the weakest possible opponent, as it maximizes the statistical chance of winning.

Bullying isn't a strategy, it's a subset of all possible competitive endeavors. Specifically in cases where there is an expectation of social cohesion, say as between classmates or coworkers (and within animal species) which is then violated, hence bullying. No one would describe a soldier "bullying" the enemy, since there is no social expectation of cooperative behavior. No, soldiers defeat, annihilate and decimate enemies. Senior soldiers bully underlings ON THEIR OWN SIDE, but not the enemy. Because of the social expectation of cooperation between soldiers on the same side.
That's an illuminating illustration. 👍 And it also offers an indication that bullying is associated (at the least) with competition. "Bullying is a subset of all possible competitive endeavors" tells us that bullying is one (of several) tools at the disposal of the competitor. I would agree with that. Those who compete seek to win, as you observe, and they use whatever tools they need to, to achieve their aims. But it's all a bit sociopathic, isn't it? Goal attainment, indifferent to the cost to others. 🤔🤔
Yes, bullying is sociopathic as it occurs in violation of social norms and expectations. Competition is not generally sociopathic since in the majority of cases it occurs in socially designated areas of legitimate competition.
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468871
LuckyR wrote: October 14th, 2024, 2:31 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:05 am
LuckyR wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:44 pm
Sy Borg wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:18 pm Bullying is one strategy that may be employed in competition. It can also simply be sadistic. Chimps and dolphins are also capable of sadism.
Huh? Those who compete seek to win. That's normal. It's baked into the nature of competition. As is seeking the weakest possible opponent, as it maximizes the statistical chance of winning.

Bullying isn't a strategy, it's a subset of all possible competitive endeavors. Specifically in cases where there is an expectation of social cohesion, say as between classmates or coworkers (and within animal species) which is then violated, hence bullying. No one would describe a soldier "bullying" the enemy, since there is no social expectation of cooperative behavior. No, soldiers defeat, annihilate and decimate enemies. Senior soldiers bully underlings ON THEIR OWN SIDE, but not the enemy. Because of the social expectation of cooperation between soldiers on the same side.
That's an illuminating illustration. 👍 And it also offers an indication that bullying is associated (at the least) with competition. "Bullying is a subset of all possible competitive endeavors" tells us that bullying is one (of several) tools at the disposal of the competitor. I would agree with that. Those who compete seek to win, as you observe, and they use whatever tools they need to, to achieve their aims. But it's all a bit sociopathic, isn't it? Goal attainment, indifferent to the cost to others. 🤔🤔
Yes, bullying is sociopathic as it occurs in violation of social norms and expectations. Competition is not generally sociopathic since in the majority of cases it occurs in socially designated areas of legitimate competition.
I would say bullying is more usually psychologically predatory than sociopathic. It isn't necessarily sadistic. Often it's a means to an end - fighting dirty to gain an unfair edge in competition. One doesn't need to be a sociopath to bully, just an immature or cynical human. It's one of many nasty possible behaviours that we humans manage to perpetrate in the argy bargy of life.
#468881
Sy Borg wrote: October 12th, 2024, 7:33 pm Consider all the ways that farmers can be inconsiderate and harsh towards animals, in ways that they could not if all parties were of comparable power.
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:14 am In fairness (😯), farmers are captors, or jailers. This is intrinsically "inconsiderate and harsh towards animals", as far as the animals are concerned. The *role* of the farmer is antithetic to the welfare and wellbeing of their charges. We even disable them (removing horns, or putting nose-rings into bull's faces to control them) to prevent them from harming humans, and from resisting or escaping their captivity.

Is this bullying? I suppose it could be seen as so, but I think this 👆 goes way beyond bullying, don't you? We *own* and *use* the animals in our custody, then we execute and eat them. They live their lives, from birth to death, including breeding more victims, in controlled confinement. I'm not sure what the right word for it should be. Even slavery doesn't seem to go far enough. And "bullying" doesn't cover it, IMO.
Sy Borg wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:48 pm No, you are completely off track. Farmers may or may not be bullies to the animals, just as bosses may bully or not bully their workers.

BTW, the word you are groping for is "predation".
This kind of slavery (?) is far more than predation. Predation is what the owl does to the mice. But it doesn't imprison and enslave the mice, it hunts, kills, and eats them.
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468882
LuckyR wrote: October 14th, 2024, 2:31 am Yes, bullying is sociopathic as it occurs in violation of social norms and expectations. Competition is not generally sociopathic since in the majority of cases it occurs in socially designated areas of legitimate competition.
Sy Borg wrote: October 14th, 2024, 3:44 am I would say bullying is more usually psychologically predatory than sociopathic. It isn't necessarily sadistic. Often it's a means to an end - fighting dirty to gain an unfair edge in competition. One doesn't need to be a sociopath to bully, just an immature or cynical human. It's one of many nasty possible behaviours that we humans manage to perpetrate in the argy bargy of life.
I think we are agreed that bullying is common among humans. But now we seem to be wondering about a definition of bullying. What does it include, and what is above and beyond mere 'bullying'? I am surprised to find that we are wondering if what humans do to 'food animals' is bullying.

Bullying has many definitions, and we have many interpretations of exactly what the word means. But Dictionary.com suggests this as a definition: "Bullying — the act of harassing, intimidating, or abusing others, especially habitually or from a perceived position of relative power".

That doesn't seem to extend easily to cover our treatment of other animals, particularly food animals.
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
User avatar
By Mo_reese
#468886
It seems there are two types of bullying being discussed. One where a stark imbalance of power is used to overpower and humiliate a weaker victim, for example when the bigger kid takes the lunch money from the small kid. This isn't competition and IMO not healthy for society. This type of bully is usually insecure and themselves victims of bullying.
Although I haven't found such a definition it seems from discussions here that strong competition for power or resources can involve bullying. Some view these actions beneficial to society. It looks to me like too much of this domineering is detrimental and what usually brings down societies that rely on such. Mussolini's Italy comes to mind.
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468893
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 14th, 2024, 8:39 amBullying has many definitions, and we have many interpretations of exactly what the word means. But Dictionary.com suggests this as a definition: "Bullying — the act of harassing, intimidating, or abusing others, especially habitually or from a perceived position of relative power".

That doesn't seem to extend easily to cover our treatment of other animals, particularly food animals.
The idea that farmers have never been sadistic towards animals is as unrealistic as the idea that bosses are have never been sadistic towards staff. Of course, most farmers and bosses are not cruel or unfair to those under their power, but there is a percentage, unfortunately. These people can rightly be termed "bullies".
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468894
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 14th, 2024, 8:32 am
Sy Borg wrote: October 12th, 2024, 7:33 pm Consider all the ways that farmers can be inconsiderate and harsh towards animals, in ways that they could not if all parties were of comparable power.
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:14 am In fairness (😯), farmers are captors, or jailers. This is intrinsically "inconsiderate and harsh towards animals", as far as the animals are concerned. The *role* of the farmer is antithetic to the welfare and wellbeing of their charges. We even disable them (removing horns, or putting nose-rings into bull's faces to control them) to prevent them from harming humans, and from resisting or escaping their captivity.

Is this bullying? I suppose it could be seen as so, but I think this 👆 goes way beyond bullying, don't you? We *own* and *use* the animals in our custody, then we execute and eat them. They live their lives, from birth to death, including breeding more victims, in controlled confinement. I'm not sure what the right word for it should be. Even slavery doesn't seem to go far enough. And "bullying" doesn't cover it, IMO.
Sy Borg wrote: October 13th, 2024, 9:48 pm No, you are completely off track. Farmers may or may not be bullies to the animals, just as bosses may bully or not bully their workers.

BTW, the word you are groping for is "predation".
This kind of slavery (?) is far more than predation. Predation is what the owl does to the mice. But it doesn't imprison and enslave the mice, it hunts, kills, and eats them.
Humans simply have different methods of predation, just as they have all manner of different methods to other species. It's still predation. Bullying can be psychological predation - where the bully gains advantage (or thinks they do) by diminishing another.
By Gertie
#468897
Mo_reese wrote: October 14th, 2024, 11:55 am It seems there are two types of bullying being discussed. One where a stark imbalance of power is used to overpower and humiliate a weaker victim, for example when the bigger kid takes the lunch money from the small kid. This isn't competition and IMO not healthy for society. This type of bully is usually insecure and themselves victims of bullying.
Although I haven't found such a definition it seems from discussions here that strong competition for power or resources can involve bullying. Some view these actions beneficial to society. It looks to me like too much of this domineering is detrimental and what usually brings down societies that rely on such. Mussolini's Italy comes to mind.
Yes it's the taking advantage of a power imbalance to do harm that characterises bullying to me.

It's natural in the way we have selfish predispositions which help us survive and reproduce. But as a social species we also have a natural sense of fairness which makes bullying feel yucky.

Of course there are variations in individuals, and the role of the environment (cultural and personal experience) will contribute to that. But we've survived as a species employing both selfish and social traits
Generally speaking societies find a balance which works, until it doesn't, then the balance shifts.

That's the Is of human nature. How we Ought to behave is a different, moral, question. Humans are smart too - we're primarily driven by our passions as Hume would say, but we can also conceptualise about Right and Wrong, and change our behaviour accordingly. Somewhat.

Then again we can use our smarts to rationalise pretty much anything, often without even realising.
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468899
Gertie wrote: October 14th, 2024, 7:08 pmYes it's the taking advantage of a power imbalance to do harm that characterises bullying to me.
Yes.

One can take advantage of a power imbalance, but it's not bullying as such until there is intent to do harm above and beyond simply exploiting a competitive advantage.
#468908
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 14th, 2024, 8:39 amBullying has many definitions, and we have many interpretations of exactly what the word means. But Dictionary.com suggests this as a definition: "Bullying — the act of harassing, intimidating, or abusing others, especially habitually or from a perceived position of relative power".

That doesn't seem to extend easily to cover our treatment of other animals, particularly food animals.
Sy Borg wrote: October 14th, 2024, 5:20 pm The idea that farmers have never been sadistic towards animals is as unrealistic as the idea that bosses are have never been sadistic towards staff.
Is this just a semantic misunderstanding? I think "bullying" and "sadism" are similar, but different things, nevertheless?

Sy Borg wrote: October 14th, 2024, 5:26 pm Humans simply have different methods of predation, just as they have all manner of different methods to other species. It's still predation. Bullying can be psychological predation - where the bully gains advantage (or thinks they do) by diminishing another.
The same with "predation", which isn't "bullying" either?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468909
Mo_reese wrote: October 14th, 2024, 11:55 am It seems there are two types of bullying being discussed. One where a stark imbalance of power is used to overpower and humiliate a weaker victim, for example when the bigger kid takes the lunch money from the small kid. This isn't competition and IMO not healthy for society. This type of bully is usually insecure and themselves victims of bullying.
Although I haven't found such a definition it seems from discussions here that strong competition for power or resources can involve bullying. Some view these actions beneficial to society. It looks to me like too much of this domineering is detrimental and what usually brings down societies that rely on such. Mussolini's Italy comes to mind.
Gertie wrote: October 14th, 2024, 7:08 pm Yes it's the taking advantage of a power imbalance to do harm that characterises bullying to me.

It's natural in the way we have selfish predispositions which help us survive and reproduce. But as a social species we also have a natural sense of fairness which makes bullying feel yucky.

Of course there are variations in individuals, and the role of the environment (cultural and personal experience) will contribute to that. But we've survived as a species employing both selfish and social traits
Generally speaking societies find a balance which works, until it doesn't, then the balance shifts.

That's the Is of human nature. How we Ought to behave is a different, moral, question. Humans are smart too - we're primarily driven by our passions as Hume would say, but we can also conceptualise about Right and Wrong, and change our behaviour accordingly. Somewhat.

Then again we can use our smarts to rationalise pretty much anything, often without even realising.
Beautifully summarised.

— Yes, we are, in part, disagreeing over our personal understandings of "bullying", and other related terms.
— Yes, humans have employed selfish behaviour and co-operative behaviour since we came down from the trees.

So does that mean bullying will never stop, never go away? Are we all doomed to be aggressors (the bullies) or victims (the bullied), with no third option?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
User avatar
By Mo_reese
#468925
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 15th, 2024, 7:10 am
So does that mean bullying will never stop, never go away? Are we all doomed to be aggressors (the bullies) or victims (the bullied), with no third option?

Bullying is overlooked by too many people and even encouraged by some as something that will make the victims stronger. The opposite is usually true. In adolescents it can lead to suicides.
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#468927
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 15th, 2024, 7:01 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 14th, 2024, 8:39 amBullying has many definitions, and we have many interpretations of exactly what the word means. But Dictionary.com suggests this as a definition: "Bullying — the act of harassing, intimidating, or abusing others, especially habitually or from a perceived position of relative power".

That doesn't seem to extend easily to cover our treatment of other animals, particularly food animals.
Sy Borg wrote: October 14th, 2024, 5:20 pm The idea that farmers have never been sadistic towards animals is as unrealistic as the idea that bosses are have never been sadistic towards staff.
Is this just a semantic misunderstanding? I think "bullying" and "sadism" are similar, but different things, nevertheless?

Sy Borg wrote: October 14th, 2024, 5:26 pm Humans simply have different methods of predation, just as they have all manner of different methods to other species. It's still predation. Bullying can be psychological predation - where the bully gains advantage (or thinks they do) by diminishing another.
The same with "predation", which isn't "bullying" either?
You did not understand what I was saying.

I know more about bullying than anyone here by a long chalk. I am not expert in many things, but I am expert in this area. I was almost driven to suicide by extreme bullying throughout high school, and later was bullied at various jobs.

I spent years working in OH&S, and I was the go-to person when workers called, complaining of bullying in the workplace. I later created a website - the first website in my state to address bullying in a professional manner - providing information on how the behaviour interacted (or, more usually, didn't interact) with legislation, regulations and industry standards. I developed and provided anti-bullying resources used by various schools, universities and workplaces all around the world - Australia, US, Europe, South Africa, south and Central America, and the Middle East.

Obviously bullying and sadism are different, but my point was that some bosses and farmers are actively sadistic, and that leads to bullying. Bullying does not need to be sadistic - there are competitive and practical rationalisations for it - but sadism plus power plus a lack of self-restraint will equal bullying.

As for psychological predation. That is the aggressive undermining of another's psyche to boost your own.

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


Materialism Vs Idealism

After writing that I was thinking that, in a se[…]

DEI and Doublespeak

This is a competitive world. Not everyone wins[…]

It seems to me that a "true atheist" is […]

It doesn't matter who's in power - sheer populatio[…]