Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

Philosophy Discussion Forums
A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.

This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.


Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
#468807
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 11th, 2024, 6:43 am
Belinda wrote: October 10th, 2024, 12:27 pm How anyone can claim the brain and the mind are identical is explicable only by lack of imagination.
I'm not sure if they claim they're *identical*. I think they claim that the mind is generated, or supported, (🤔) wholly by the brain. In other words, there is no part of the mind that is *not* dependent on the brain. Their idea could be correct, but it might be mistaken too. I don't think there is enough evidence to go with either hypothesis, is there?
It is evident to most people that what they can think about, and feel, is not the same as what can be weighed and measured which is their brains. You are talking about epiphenomenalism: that mind is an unnecessary adjunct of brain.
The evidence is such that human beings and probably some other animals too could not exist unless they experienced stuff, and moreover, in the case of human beings ,were aware that they did so.
Location: UK
#468811
Sculptor1 wrote: October 10th, 2024, 2:34 pm None of this comes close to the disabling dualism which sees the mind as independant of the body.
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 11th, 2024, 6:48 am 😮 Do people really think the mind could be *independent* of the body? Separate and separable? The mind might not be wholly contained (?) by the body, but...?

Wow.
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:19 am I'm surprised you are asking this question.
Have you never heard of a "soul" and the idea that the personality can exist without the need for a healthy brain?
I think I've already answered this point:
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 11th, 2024, 8:21 am We would all *like* to think there may be some sort of continuation after bodily death. I would only say [...] that we have no reason to conclude that (some form of) life after bodily death is impossible. To go farther than that, without evidence, is just fantasy, I think.
I direct your attention to my final sentence. 👍
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468812
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:22 am Sensation happens in the brain.
I think you chose the wrong word? I think perception happens in the brainmind, while sensation is more located with the sensory organs themselves, and their connections to the brainmind. But I agree with the point you're making here (and before).
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468813
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 12th, 2024, 8:49 am
Sculptor1 wrote: October 10th, 2024, 2:34 pm None of this comes close to the disabling dualism which sees the mind as independant of the body.
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 11th, 2024, 6:48 am 😮 Do people really think the mind could be *independent* of the body? Separate and separable? The mind might not be wholly contained (?) by the body, but...?

Wow.
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:19 am I'm surprised you are asking this question.
Have you never heard of a "soul" and the idea that the personality can exist without the need for a healthy brain?
I think I've already answered this point:
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 11th, 2024, 8:21 am We would all *like* to think there may be some sort of continuation after bodily death. I would only say [...] that we have no reason to conclude that (some form of) life after bodily death is impossible. To go farther than that, without evidence, is just fantasy, I think.
I direct your attention to my final sentence. 👍
So why DID you ask?
#468814
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 12th, 2024, 8:53 am
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:22 am Sensation happens in the brain.
I think you chose the wrong word? I think perception happens in the brainmind, while sensation is more located with the sensory organs themselves, and their connections to the brainmind. But I agree with the point you're making here (and before).
No I said exactly what I wanted to say. All sensations ,pain, perceptions of all kinds happen in neural tissue. That is principally the brain but also includes the exceptions I already laid out that there is small amounts of the same tissue in the but and heart.
#468831
Lagayscienza , what do you think religion is ?

Seems like you think religion is a type of belief ?

Maybe, from the direction this discussion has taken, you identify religion with philosophies that posit non-corporeal minds ?

That seems to me a not-uncommon view. Amongst those in Western culture, I.e. culture that grew out of Christianity. Which, as a matter of historical accident, came up with creeds as a device for deciding who is part of the religion and who is an outsider, a heretic.

Seems to me that when people say "spiritual but not religious" they mean something like "religious but not credal". Having a sense of the sacred, without signing up to a creed, a belief-package approved by a church hierarchy.

Spirituality is religion for freethinkers.
#468836
I like the idea of spirituality. I like the vibe. I like its ideas, mythologies and how it encourages deep thought.

But, in reality, I am about as spiritual as my PC ... analysis, a busy mind and an inability to surrender ... stuff that is basically antithetical to the divine and sacred. Just another dopey chimp. Maybe in my next life haha
#468845
Good_Egg wrote: October 13th, 2024, 3:53 am ...what do you think religion is ?

Seems like you think religion is a type of belief ?

Maybe, from the direction this discussion has taken, you identify religion with philosophies that posit non-corporeal minds ?

That seems to me a not-uncommon view. Amongst those in Western culture, I.e. culture that grew out of Christianity. Which, as a matter of historical accident, came up with creeds as a device for deciding who is part of the religion and who is an outsider, a heretic.

Seems to me that when people say "spiritual but not religious" they mean something like "religious but not credal". Having a sense of the sacred, without signing up to a creed, a belief-package approved by a church hierarchy.

Spirituality is religion for freethinkers.
That seems fair enough. Although it's fair to observe that a creed is simply a statement of belief. A creed is a religious group saying "this is what we believe; it is what members of our group believe". There's no obvious harm in that.

But yes, "spirituality" is a wider and more nuanced view on matters non-physical. I would describe my own non-physical beliefs as spiritual, not religious, but I suppose that really doesn't matter. My beliefs are what they are; your beliefs are what *they* are. No matter what label we use to describe them.

I also prefer a non-dogmatic approach to belief, as you also seem to do. Yours is a nice summary.👆
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468846
Sy Borg wrote: October 13th, 2024, 4:26 am I like the idea of spirituality. I like the vibe. I like its ideas, mythologies and how it encourages deep thought.

But, in reality, I am about as spiritual as my PC ...
It seems not. Your first sentence seems to contradict what follows. Your "liking" for spirituality seems to say that you have spiritual beliefs, even if you don't care to pursue them beyond that "liking". That's OK. Neither religion nor spirituality are compulsory. 😁👍
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468847
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 10:37 am All sensations ,pain, perceptions of all kinds happen in neural tissue. That is principally the brain but also includes the exceptions I already laid out that there is small amounts of the same tissue in the but and heart.
Processing of (for example) optical sensation begins in the optic nerve, before the impulses (?) reach the brain. Yes, brains and nerves are made of the same sorts of cells; neurons, and the like, are not confined to the brain. They are all over our bodies. The distribution of 'function' is such that it makes made-up terms like brainmind or bodymind more useful than just brain, mind and body.

We love to separate aspects of ourselves and our bodyminds, but the truth seems to be that most 'function' is distributed, not concentrated. Is this what you're getting at?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468851
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 8:56 am
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 10:37 am All sensations ,pain, perceptions of all kinds happen in neural tissue. That is principally the brain but also includes the exceptions I already laid out that there is small amounts of the same tissue in the but and heart.
Processing of (for example) optical sensation begins in the optic nerve, before the impulses (?) reach the brain. Yes, brains and nerves are made of the same sorts of cells; neurons, and the like, are not confined to the brain. They are all over our bodies. The distribution of 'function' is such that it makes made-up terms like brainmind or bodymind more useful than just brain, mind and body.

We love to separate aspects of ourselves and our bodyminds, but the truth seems to be that most 'function' is distributed, not concentrated. Is this what you're getting at?
Erratum above should have said "gut" not "but".
Aside from brain gut and heart I disagree with your POV.
I am taking about "feeling"; sensation, perception, and pain. It's neural phenomenon. Ordinary nerves carry electrical impulses, the neural matter interprets and this interpretation is the "feeling".
#468859
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 5:22 am
Count Lucanor wrote: October 11th, 2024, 3:06 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: October 10th, 2024, 5:39 pm
Count Lucanor wrote: October 10th, 2024, 4:33 pm
"Feeling it in the brain" does not mean the effect of the hammer magically teletransporting to a location in the brain. It hits skin, muscle and bone tissues in the thumb where neurons called pain receptors are located. This receptors from the Peripheral Nervous System, which is distributed in the whole body, send the pain signals to the Central Nervous System via fibers in the spinal cord, and then to the brain. The system which makes this work is comprised by the Peripheral Nervous System and the Central Nervous System, covering the whole body.

Last time I saw, nerves were very fleshy, bodily parts. We experience the world with our bodies.
I think you are missing the point.
No amount of crushed, burned , or otherwise damaged flesh, bone, skin, or sinew has anything to do with pain.
If it did then I would have to take more care chopping up my steaks. And the minced beef I had today would be a horrorific devastation of hell.
Imagine what open heart surgery would be. No Pain is qualia.
OK then, maybe I should have clarified: when I said body, a meant a living body.
Not even that lets you off. You have heard of anasthesia? It is erfectly possible for a living body to feel no pain.
Additionally people who loose limbs can still "feel" the limb. How would you account for that?
Sensation happens in the brain.
Anesthesia? Guess what, you need a body for that to work in the first place. That goes to my point that all our experiences occur in the unity of the self that is the body. Sensations happen in your body, through its senses in connection with the whole CNS, that includes the brain.
People without a limb had to have a real limb at some time in their lives for it to have been imprinted in their brain.
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco Location: Panama
#468880
Sculptor1 wrote: October 13th, 2024, 11:06 am I am talking about "feeling"; sensation, perception, and pain. It's a neural phenomenon. Ordinary nerves carry electrical impulses, the neural matter interprets, and this interpretation is the "feeling".
I wouldn't've expected "feeling" to refer to sensation and perception. Isn't the word more normally used to refer to emotions, not perception? Sorry for my confusion.
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
#468884
Sculptor1 wrote: October 13th, 2024, 11:06 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: October 13th, 2024, 8:56 am
Sculptor1 wrote: October 12th, 2024, 10:37 am All sensations ,pain, perceptions of all kinds happen in neural tissue. That is principally the brain but also includes the exceptions I already laid out that there is small amounts of the same tissue in the but and heart.
Processing of (for example) optical sensation begins in the optic nerve, before the impulses (?) reach the brain. Yes, brains and nerves are made of the same sorts of cells; neurons, and the like, are not confined to the brain. They are all over our bodies. The distribution of 'function' is such that it makes made-up terms like brainmind or bodymind more useful than just brain, mind and body.

We love to separate aspects of ourselves and our bodyminds, but the truth seems to be that most 'function' is distributed, not concentrated. Is this what you're getting at?
Erratum above should have said "gut" not "but".
Aside from brain gut and heart I disagree with your POV.
I am taking about "feeling"; sensation, perception, and pain. It's neural phenomenon. Ordinary nerves carry electrical impulses, the neural matter interprets and this interpretation is the "feeling".
"neural matter" acts electro-chemically .The grey matter is where concepts and percepts form feelings. Feelings are subjective and can't be measured like electro-chemical activity can be measured.
I always think the reflex arc is a useful means for getting the general idea of neural activity
Location: UK
  • 1
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 46

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


There are things going on in all physical sys[…]

Materialism Vs Idealism

We can be good old fashioned materialists and s[…]

...a division in yourself as a synthetic human b[…]

DEI and Doublespeak

I've never really understood why the investor g[…]