- Site Admin
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic
I do. So often I found him quickly brushing off something he just condemned as "immoral" by making a double-standard for the state. This seems like a special pleading fallacy. I feel it may have been less blatantly fallacious if Shermer provided an in depth explanation of why an exemption to his moral rules shall be made for a group of people claiming to be a state AND provided an argument to support his repeated ipse dixit that we need a big "Leviathan" to claim a monopoly on the "legitimate" [special pleading fallacy double-standard] use of force.
Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
- Posts: 675
- Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Neitszche
- Location: Antipodes