The March Philosophy Book of the Month is Final Notice by Van Fleisher. Discuss Final Notice now.
The April Philosophy Book of the Month is The Unbound Soul by Richard L. Haight. Discuss The Unbound Soul Now
The May Philosophy Book of the Month is Misreading Judas by Robert Wahler.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: April 6th, 2019, 6:03 am
I'm trying to understand deontology vs. consequentialism vs. virtue ethics and I'm trying to figure out whether I'm understanding this right.
Here's the example I'm thinking of...
I engage a contractor to do a job and he does the job and everything is fine. Deontology, consequetionalism and virtue ethics say that whether I engage the contractor or not is morally neutral.
Now, same situation as above... except I find out that the contractor (a) cheats on his taxes, or (b) doesn't pay his workers, or (c) uses stolen goods in his work. Now that I know that his work is not above board, does that change the ethics of choosing to engage him? Does the extent to which he's not above board effect the decision? So where I'm stuck is that it seems wrong to engage him... but why?
What if: (d) he says that he's installing a new door, but in fact he's found an as-new door on the side of the road and passes it off as new. Deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics should still deem this decision neutral, right?
Would appreciate if any of you could provide some clarity!... Though, I have a feeling it may just pull me further into the philosophical black hole.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic
Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
- Posts: 268
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Fascinating.Scott wrote: ↑April 16th, 2019, 2:33 pmDeontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics don't deem anything morally good or immoral. They are categories of moral and ethical codes that describe what aspects the various differing disagreeing codes in that category consider when determines the morality of something such as action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue. Two moral codes in the same category might disagree about whether a specific action/behavior/intent/consequence/virtue is immoral, morally good, or neutral.
I love it when Scott explains these things for us in plain English.
Thank you Scott.