Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

Philosophy Discussion Forums
A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.

This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.


Discuss the November 2022 Philosophy Book of the Month, In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes.

To post in this forum, you must buy and read the book. After buying the book, please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
Forum rules: This forum is for discussing the book In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All. Anyone can view the forum and read the post, but only people who purchased the book can post in the forum.

If your purchase has not already been verified (i.e. if you don't already have access to post in this forum), then please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
#429535
Scott wrote: November 17th, 2022, 12:26 pm
Dattatraya wrote: November 17th, 2022, 6:44 am After reading all the posts ( as of now) it's my observation and conclusion, that the original question and the answers opinions/comments/discussion of the participants, are related/concerned (only ) about ' change in the body '.

Why we should not go and think beyond ' body ' ?! ( one member has rightly said: the body is not more than ' simply a vessel for one's life force ' )

The reader/anybody will be in a better position to think about and comment or give opinion, about the original question;
if ' I ' , ' Me '. ' you '. are defined completely .

And what is ' one's life force ' ?

:)
Interesting points and questions! :)

Perhaps, the words "I", "me", and "you"—at least in the sense of what the book refers to as the real you and the real me and the real us—all refer to that which never changes.

That would help explain why few if any would talk about it changing: For then it is something that by definition does not and cannot change.

Then, possibly, we could define the bodily and physical as that which is under constant flux, meaning that which constantly changing.
What I have heard from both religious as well as philosophical content is that the things that never changes is 'changing'. And I think it is applicable to everything including consciousness as well. Why should consciousness remain unchanged while everything else that even influence the existence of the consciousness are changing. (I do not think that consciousness is an independent thing which is devoid of any inputs from other sources including our body and it senses)
#429536
Bertha Jackson wrote: November 17th, 2022, 12:56 pm Even though we may appear to be the same person, I do not believe our souls will change. Therefore, we would still be two separate individuals who may look and think alike.
If the souls are not changed, why would the two of us think alike? And when the bodies are changed, why would we look alike? When our brains and everything else are changed, why would we think alike? Why would anything have to be changed from their state before the morph, simply because of the morph? 🤔
#429537
Scott wrote: November 17th, 2022, 4:25 pm
Bertha Jackson wrote: November 17th, 2022, 12:56 pm Even though we may appear to be the same person, I do not believe our souls will change. Therefore, we would still be two separate individuals who may look and think alike.
What if the atom-by-atom copy of me was made with the actual atoms from my original body?

For example, what if somehow, the atoms in your body were swapped out one-by-one with the atoms from my body, such that your body didn't merely become a copy of mine but also became a literal re-creation (along the lines of the Star Trek transporter) of mine with the actual atoms that currently make up mine?

Or vice versa: What if mine become a copy of yours, with your memories and everything?
If I am understanding this correct, then one of the two selves should have gone from the physical world, and two identical copies of one's self should have remained. If the only thing that could not have replaced was consciousness, then the real self would have still remained. But for the outer world, one of the two would have been just a past memory.
#429538
mrlefty0706 wrote: November 19th, 2022, 12:36 am I have read several of the replies to this topic and I can see how readers have different perspectives. I agree with the author that one would be an identical copy of the other since it is atom by atom including the brain. The only difference that cannot be duplicated is one's soul since it is not a physical part of the body but is an extremely important part of every human being. I do believe that people like Putin are soulless but that should stimulate a different topic.
I can agree with the initial part of your comment. But regarding some fellows being soulless, I think it is just a figurative speech rather than a literal one. Either we all should have souls, or none of us should have souls. There cannot be any in betweens. If it is necessary to have a soul to be a talking and living human being, then even Putin should have a soul, despite his political decisions and agendas. And if this topic is needed to be extended to a political one, I think there are many political leaders who can be put on the same pedestal as Putin.
#429554
Sushan wrote: November 28th, 2022, 2:43 am
Scott wrote: November 17th, 2022, 12:03 pm
Maduabuchi Eze wrote: November 16th, 2022, 6:09 pm our true identity, that is, the defining aspect of our true nature is spiritual and unique (even though, as you mentioned in your book, there are certain energies and aspirations we hold in common).

[emphasis added]
Thank you for your reply, Maduabuchi. :)

On what basis are you claiming our spirit(s) are "unique". What evidence is there for that alleged uniqueness?

Is it possible you've accidentally committed the begging the question fallacy?

To better understand the context of your reply, may I ask what your answers are to the opening question in the book? (It's titled the "opening question", it's technically two questions.)
Well, nothing discussed in this topic are physically provable, but only allegations. So we can neither accept nor deny our consciousnesses being either unique or common. Since we do not see our consciousnesses (or cannot see) what we can say for sure is that we all are different ane unique from what is there to be seen, including our bodies, clothes, behaviours, egos, etc.
:)

' Since we do not see our consciousnesses (or cannot see) what we can say for sure is that we all are different ane unique from what is there to be seen, including our bodies, clothes, behaviours, egos, etc.'

I am having a query here.
Is our topic/ subject and question is restricted to only things or entities which are visible?!
Spirit, consciousness, feelings and emotions which make a person ' live ' can be sensed and understood though can not be seen! 'Me and you ' are into existence - are visible - only with the above said invisible entities!
Will only the body change can complete the transformation of me into you?
#429588
hsimone wrote: November 19th, 2022, 12:59 pm Okay, I’m going to take a chance in asking a question. 😬🙃

How would this question relate to the individuals we care and love so much? Would we then shift the love we have to another significant other? Or shift the love we have for our children for other children?

Does that make sense? 🤔
I think the question is complex enough without thinking about this new question that you raised. 😉

But when thinking deeper, there cannot be a thing called love for the loved ones since we all are same when we are stripped to the core. So the love that we express towards everyone should be the same. Then there will not be any difference if I am you or you are me.
#429591
hsimone wrote: November 20th, 2022, 3:37 pm
Dattatraya wrote: November 20th, 2022, 4:47 am
hsimone wrote: November 19th, 2022, 12:59 pm Okay, I’m going to take a chance in asking a question. 😬🙃

How would this question relate to the individuals we care and love so much? Would we then shift the love we have to another significant other? Or shift the love we have for our children for other children?

Does that make sense? 🤔
' Our children '
And
'Other children '

What may be the change after
' Transformation ' predicted : There will be no existence of ' our ' and ' other '!

Here comes in the picture: The Soul !

:)
That makes sense. :)

Guess I don’t really want to think about not knowing and loving my own children since that makes it sound like none of this matters. That everything we’ve gone through to become the family that we are means nothing. Then, if none of what we do matters, then what’s the point of doing anything at all.

This is probably the most philosophical I’ve ever been! 🙃
Thinking too far is always dangerous. If we go on thinking and thinking we tend to realize that after all that we have accomplished, we simply have to leave behind our successes and loved ones and leave this world when we die. If someone ruminate over this thought it will definitely lead that one to remain without doing nothing, simply because there is no use in doing anything. Why should we achieve things if they are temporary? Why should not we wait till the inevitable dedeath comes to us without uselessly tiring ourselves?
#429592
Dattatraya wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:46 am
Mayuri Kotalawala wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:14 am "Whatever we do is directed by our Mind. And maybe by Soul.The value of our acts is always included in the work itself.There is no need to think about the intention and result. If we are honest and genuine, we will get satisfaction and happiness!"- Dattatraya, this I can agree with.
I am very happy, Sister.
I will like to add - We are driven by Destiny!
And Destiny is always with us.
Never to bother for disturbances.

:)
That leaves me with a question. If we are driven by the destiny, why should we try to achieve and gain things, without we merely achieving and gaining what are destined for us? When people cunningly gain what is more suitable for someone else, do they change the destiny of them as well as the other party? 🤔
#429593
Mayuri Kotalawala wrote: November 26th, 2022, 12:53 pm
Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: November 25th, 2022, 5:08 pm Whatever we do is directed by our Mind. And maybe by Soul. - Meaning what?

It is what our Mind brings from the previous body or past life experience that influences the present body. For instance, if a person is good at playing a musical instrument or singing, it maybe because he/she practised it a lot in the past life and that information retained in the Mind which came to this life.
It seems like you have read the book Many Mansions, and I too have to agree with what you say as there are occasions when people like musicians bring their talents from their births. And there is no way to explain such a thing either without the support of this sort of a theory, or finding whether their mothers had extensive music lessons while they were pregnant. If there was nothing unique in different humans, there should not have been any difference among humans at all.

And by the way, I am happy to see someone from my own country participating in this discussion. 😊
#429793
Sushan wrote: November 28th, 2022, 1:54 pm
Dattatraya wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:46 am
Mayuri Kotalawala wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:14 am "Whatever we do is directed by our Mind. And maybe by Soul.The value of our acts is always included in the work itself.There is no need to think about the intention and result. If we are honest and genuine, we will get satisfaction and happiness!"- Dattatraya, this I can agree with.
I am very happy, Sister.
I will like to add - We are driven by Destiny!
And Destiny is always with us.
Never to bother for disturbances.

:)
That leaves me with a question. If we are driven by the destiny, why should we try to achieve and gain things, without we merely achieving and gaining what are destined for us? When people cunningly gain what is more suitable for someone else, do they change the destiny of them as well as the other party? 🤔
:)

Question 1:- We should take the meaning as- whatever we do ( maybe to achieve and gain things ) is in accordance with the plan of destiny! There is no instance of ' more or less '!

Question 2:- People cannot change the destiny of any other person or party. They try to monitor and play with their own destiny. ' Gaining cunningly ' is a temporary gain! Whoever clauses this injustice has to face consequences!

:)
#431896
Dattatraya wrote: November 30th, 2022, 9:46 am
Sushan wrote: November 28th, 2022, 1:54 pm
Dattatraya wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:46 am
Mayuri Kotalawala wrote: November 21st, 2022, 12:14 am "Whatever we do is directed by our Mind. And maybe by Soul.The value of our acts is always included in the work itself.There is no need to think about the intention and result. If we are honest and genuine, we will get satisfaction and happiness!"- Dattatraya, this I can agree with.
I am very happy, Sister.
I will like to add - We are driven by Destiny!
And Destiny is always with us.
Never to bother for disturbances.

:)
That leaves me with a question. If we are driven by the destiny, why should we try to achieve and gain things, without we merely achieving and gaining what are destined for us? When people cunningly gain what is more suitable for someone else, do they change the destiny of them as well as the other party? 🤔
:)

Question 1:- We should take the meaning as- whatever we do ( maybe to achieve and gain things ) is in accordance with the plan of destiny! There is no instance of ' more or less '!

Question 2:- People cannot change the destiny of any other person or party. They try to monitor and play with their own destiny. ' Gaining cunningly ' is a temporary gain! Whoever clauses this injustice has to face consequences!

:)
This sounds scary. So do we not have even our own volition? Do we do things just because they are being written somewhere to be done by us at a particular time in a particular way?

But why this destiny is so discriminating then? How does it choose some people to be rich while some being poor? Why everyone cannot be equal?
#431898
Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: December 2nd, 2022, 4:39 pm Would there be a difference in replacing every atom in turn rather than replacing the entire person at once?
I think there is. When we do it atom by atom there is subtlety. When things are subtle people do not feel the change. But if something done grossly and quickly, people tend to notice that even there is no change at all. So here the author might have wanted to exclude that error that I mentioned latter from the question. Otherwise the final result will have no difference whether you replace atom by atom or the whole subject at once.
#431916
Sushan wrote: December 30th, 2022, 3:25 am
Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: December 2nd, 2022, 4:39 pm Would there be a difference in replacing every atom in turn rather than replacing the entire person at once?
I think there is. When we do it atom by atom there is subtlety. When things are subtle people do not feel the change. But if something done grossly and quickly, people tend to notice that even there is no change at all. So here the author might have wanted to exclude that error that I mentioned latter from the question. Otherwise the final result will have no difference whether you replace atom by atom or the whole subject at once.
:wink:
Actually the original question is not clear!
........................ identical copy of my body, would you still be you

' would I still be I ' : By which way or considering what?

Also there will be no meaning for the question or answer if there is no reference.
#431940
Dattatraya wrote: December 30th, 2022, 10:01 am
Sushan wrote: December 30th, 2022, 3:25 am
Richardkcaputophd009 wrote: December 2nd, 2022, 4:39 pm Would there be a difference in replacing every atom in turn rather than replacing the entire person at once?
I think there is. When we do it atom by atom there is subtlety. When things are subtle people do not feel the change. But if something done grossly and quickly, people tend to notice that even there is no change at all. So here the author might have wanted to exclude that error that I mentioned latter from the question. Otherwise the final result will have no difference whether you replace atom by atom or the whole subject at once.
:wink:
Actually the original question is not clear!
........................ identical copy of my body, would you still be you

' would I still be I ' : By which way or considering what?

Also there will be no meaning for the question or answer if there is no reference.
The whole concept is quite confusing. But in the book the author refers as one's self to the core that we all share, yet do not see because of the outer coverings comprised of our body, mind, clothes, etc. And it is said that that core is similar for every being. In that sense the changing of outer appearance (the outer covering) has nothing to do with one's real self. But the whole concept is not easy to grasp since we refer to our selves along with all these outer coverings.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 8

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


You’re giving a special meaning to the word “disc[…]

Materialism Vs Idealism

I addressed it. I started with Occam’s razor a[…]

DEI and Doublespeak

I am for the former. Treat people equally, bas[…]

Sculptor1, Only a true atheist can be free to pe[…]