- June 3rd, 2024, 5:09 pm
#463264
Your perspective on "should-ness" and "should-not-have-ness" is thought-provoking, particularly in the context of belief in an all-powerful creator God. Your view aligns with a form of philosophical determinism or radical acceptance, where the world and its events are seen as inherently perfect and beyond reproach. This perspective suggests that questioning or wishing for a different reality implies a judgment against the creator, which you find inconsistent for believers in an all-powerful, benevolent deity.
let's take a look at these few pints;
Determinism vs. Free Will: Your perspective leans towards determinism, where everything that happens is exactly as it should be. However, many religious believers, including those who believe in an all-powerful God, also believe in free will. They might argue that while the world is created by God, human actions within it can still be subject to moral judgment and should-ness, as these actions are freely chosen and not preordained by God.
Human Perspective on Perfection: The idea that the world is perfect as it is can be comforting and aligns with some spiritual and philosophical traditions. However, many people, including those with strong religious beliefs, struggle with this concept because they experience suffering, injustice, and imperfection daily. They might argue that acknowledging these imperfections and striving to change them is part of their moral or spiritual duty.
The Problem of Evil: Your view offers a resolution to the problem of evil by suggesting that everything is as it should be. However, this stance can be challenging for those who have experienced significant suffering or trauma. They might find it difficult to reconcile their experiences with the notion of a perfect world or a perfectly benevolent deity.
Judgment and Improvement: For many, the concept of should-ness is tied to the idea of improvement and moral progress. The belief that certain things should be different drives human innovation, justice, and compassion. From this perspective, acknowledging that some things should be different doesn't necessarily imply cursing the creator but rather participating in a dynamic process of co-creation and improvement.
The Role of Suffering: Some religious traditions view suffering and imperfection as integral parts of the human experience that contribute to growth and learning. In this view, acknowledging that things could or should be different doesn't negate the overall goodness or perfection of the creation but rather highlights the complexity and depth of the human experience.
In summary, your perspective challenges conventional views on morality, determinism, and the nature of divine creation. While it offers a coherent and optimistic worldview, it also raises complex questions about human experience, suffering, and the nature of free will. Engaging with these ideas can lead to deeper philosophical and theological discussions, helping individuals refine their understanding of their beliefs and the world around them.
these are my thoughts.