Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

Philosophy Discussion Forums
A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.

This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.


Discuss the November 2022 Philosophy Book of the Month, In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes.

To post in this forum, you must buy and read the book. After buying the book, please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
Forum rules: This forum is for discussing the book In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All. Anyone can view the forum and read the post, but only people who purchased the book can post in the forum.

If your purchase has not already been verified (i.e. if you don't already have access to post in this forum), then please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
#464659
Cana Clinton wrote: July 2nd, 2024, 10:05 am People who say the world should be different are basically saying God did a bad job. Harsh, right? But isn't that the implication? If you believe in a powerful creator, then the world is their work. Complaining about it feels disrespectful, almost like yelling at a painting because you don't like the colors.
Maybe true appreciation comes from accepting the world as it is. The good, the bad, the weird - it's all part of the experience. If there's a God out there, they must have a reason for it all. Our job? To enjoy the ride, learn from the bumps, and maybe even find some beauty in the unexpected.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=509381
#464727
A doctor may say: "Y% of people who drink too much coffee develop the Z condition. You should not have drunk too much coffee to reduce the risk of having Z." While the doctor is reducing the cause of having the condition to one factor, here should-not-have-ness is doing a practically important thing. In our superficial human world, should-have-not-ness may be practically useful.

Because we do not know what is absolutely good or bad for us, our should-not-have-ness tendency may not mean that God did a bad job.
#464786
I don't share this view, but I understand that many others had similar doubts until they read your book. As I continue reading, I hope my uncertainty will be resolved. This may simply reflect my personal perspective.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=513032
#464800
God did a wonderful job creating the earth and everything in it. The only bad things are the crimes people commit. I don't agree with this idea, but I know many people had doubts until they read your book. As I keep reading, I hope my doubts will go away.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=511596
#465085
It's easy to jump to conclusions about these matters. These are complex topics, and I think it's important to have respectful, open discussions about them, just like we're doing now. Every single thing has a reason whether bad or good. The world was created perfectly.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=518064
#465321
If we believe in an all-powerful God, then labeling events or actions as "should" or "should not" implies a judgment on God's creation or decisions. Accepting things as they are, without assigning these judgments, seems more consistent with the belief in an all-powerful deity.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=521103
#465590
This question is so thought-provoking. I believe in the existence of God, but I never thought that God has done a bad in creating the universe. All elements—plants, animals, air, sands, water, etc all are interconnected in their roles in keeping the world's system running. With this, I'll say God is perfect if he exist. However, the imbalance among humans is what I can not understand. AS can not marry AS, there is possibility that the couple born SS which when born is only born to suffer. Why would God have allow that in the place? Some humans are born blind. Why should that ever exist?
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=517979
#465766
I newly came across this philosophy of 'should-not-have-ness,' and I derived some meaning from it. As much as using 'should' and 'ought' denotes a certainty that doesn't rest on us, I still believe in a creator. This is because I think He is now the only one that is meant to use those words because his certainty is perfect.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=529686
#466387
Believing in an all-powerful God while holding onto the idea that certain things "should not have happened" implies that God made mistakes. If God is truly omnipotent, then everything unfolds as intended, and labeling events as wrong or unintended contradicts that belief. This mindset questions the perfection of divine will, suggesting dissatisfaction with the nature of reality itself.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=538679
#466891
I believe in an all-powerful God and trust that everything works out for the best, even if it seems bad at first. I agree that saying something "shouldn't have happened" implies God made a mistake, which contradicts the idea of an omnipotent God.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=507311
#466938
As I read in a previous reply, I have to simply say that in my opinion, the term should is an indication of the many possibilities that human choices births. Acknowledging God's supremacy helps me understand that I and humanity as a whole have been given some level of power and that is by choice.

Our minds tell us that there are many possibilities and we act to achieve those that we desire. If I act sincerely to hit a target, but end up missing it, would I be wrong to say that I "should" have hit it?

However I can understand the concept that the term should is unnecessary and can rob an individual of inner peace, but I also imagine it to serve as something to tell me to look for my imagination in reality.
#467108
I was initially skeptical about this statement, but as you mentioned, many others shared similar doubts until they read your book. I'm currently reading it now, and I'm hoping that it will address my concerns and clarify my understanding, just like it did for others.
In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=544113
#467309
Sushan wrote: February 16th, 2024, 7:48 am The reflections you've shared on the world's perfection, the inconsistency of believers criticizing creation, and the philosophical stance on divine perfection present a thought-provoking viewpoint. However, I find myself contemplating a slightly different perspective on these matters.

Regarding the perception of the world as a perfect creation, it's essential to consider that the concept of perfection is deeply subjective and varies widely across cultures, philosophies, and individuals. While the idea of a world where every speck is in its rightful place offers a comforting vision of divine omnipotence and benevolence, it might also be worth considering the dynamic nature of creation itself. Could not the world's constant state of flux, its capacity for change and evolution, also be seen as a form of perfection? This perspective suggests that perfection includes the potential for growth, learning, and improvement, aligning with a more process-oriented view of the divine and creation.

On the inconsistency in believers' criticisms of the world, it's conceivable that expressing desires for a different world doesn't necessarily imply a belief that God did a bad job. Instead, it could reflect a deep engagement with the divine gift of free will and the responsibility it entails. Such criticisms might arise from a place of compassion and a desire to alleviate suffering, rather than from a lack of faith or ingratitude towards creation. This view posits that humans, created in the image of a thoughtful and caring God, are naturally inclined to seek justice and goodness, which sometimes requires envisioning and striving for a world that better reflects these divine attributes.

Lastly, the discussion on the philosophical implications for theism and atheism opens up an essential dialogue on the nature of belief and understanding. While it's valuable to challenge inconsistencies in beliefs, it's also crucial to acknowledge the complexity of human experience and the mystery that surrounds the divine. Faith and doubt are not always opposites but can coexist as part of a deeper exploration of one's relationship with the divine and the world. This nuanced approach allows for a belief in a perfect, all-loving God while also engaging critically with the realities of suffering and injustice, seeing them as calls to action rather than signs of divine imperfection or malice.




This perspective really brings some important details to light. It is important to know that even though a believer feels like somethings like suffering should not exist, it is equally important to acknowledge that such concepts do exist in some Holy Scriptures and are usually presented for 2 or more purposes.

I believe the first would be to teach those reading that they do not have to act in certain ways as the results would inevitably lead to conditions that people will not find favourable i.e "Thou shalt not steal" and "He who steals, if caught, shall return that which was stolen 7-fold."

The second would be to teach us that despite the way most people perceive the world to be, our actions can reflect God's true nature and grace as long as they are tailored to show how God would act according to their understand of Him. i.e "And Jesus had compassion when he looked upon the multitude."

There could be other reasons but scriptural stories teach that there are two forces in the world, forces of good and evil. While one ought to believe that all things are perfect, one also has to acknowledge that humanity is but an element that can and will be used by these forces depending on their choices which are infinite. In my opinion, the term "should" can be used by a believer to acknowledge the possibilities made by the forces of good and evil.

The quoted texts are not exactly as written in the Bible but as I remember them to be.
#467362
Solaaa wrote: August 29th, 2024, 12:34 am
Sushan wrote: February 16th, 2024, 7:48 am The reflections you've shared on the world's perfection, the inconsistency of believers criticizing creation, and the philosophical stance on divine perfection present a thought-provoking viewpoint. However, I find myself contemplating a slightly different perspective on these matters.

Regarding the perception of the world as a perfect creation, it's essential to consider that the concept of perfection is deeply subjective and varies widely across cultures, philosophies, and individuals. While the idea of a world where every speck is in its rightful place offers a comforting vision of divine omnipotence and benevolence, it might also be worth considering the dynamic nature of creation itself. Could not the world's constant state of flux, its capacity for change and evolution, also be seen as a form of perfection? This perspective suggests that perfection includes the potential for growth, learning, and improvement, aligning with a more process-oriented view of the divine and creation.

On the inconsistency in believers' criticisms of the world, it's conceivable that expressing desires for a different world doesn't necessarily imply a belief that God did a bad job. Instead, it could reflect a deep engagement with the divine gift of free will and the responsibility it entails. Such criticisms might arise from a place of compassion and a desire to alleviate suffering, rather than from a lack of faith or ingratitude towards creation. This view posits that humans, created in the image of a thoughtful and caring God, are naturally inclined to seek justice and goodness, which sometimes requires envisioning and striving for a world that better reflects these divine attributes.

Lastly, the discussion on the philosophical implications for theism and atheism opens up an essential dialogue on the nature of belief and understanding. While it's valuable to challenge inconsistencies in beliefs, it's also crucial to acknowledge the complexity of human experience and the mystery that surrounds the divine. Faith and doubt are not always opposites but can coexist as part of a deeper exploration of one's relationship with the divine and the world. This nuanced approach allows for a belief in a perfect, all-loving God while also engaging critically with the realities of suffering and injustice, seeing them as calls to action rather than signs of divine imperfection or malice.




This perspective really brings some important details to light. It is important to know that even though a believer feels like somethings like suffering should not exist, it is equally important to acknowledge that such concepts do exist in some Holy Scriptures and are usually presented for 2 or more purposes.

I believe the first would be to teach those reading that they do not have to act in certain ways as the results would inevitably lead to conditions that people will not find favourable i.e "Thou shalt not steal" and "He who steals, if caught, shall return that which was stolen 7-fold."

The second would be to teach us that despite the way most people perceive the world to be, our actions can reflect God's true nature and grace as long as they are tailored to show how God would act according to their understand of Him. i.e "And Jesus had compassion when he looked upon the multitude."

There could be other reasons but scriptural stories teach that there are two forces in the world, forces of good and evil. While one ought to believe that all things are perfect, one also has to acknowledge that humanity is but an element that can and will be used by these forces depending on their choices which are infinite. In my opinion, the term "should" can be used by a believer to acknowledge the possibilities made by the forces of good and evil.

The quoted texts are not exactly as written in the Bible but as I remember them to be.
Instead of framing our understanding of morality and divine actions in terms of what "should" or "should not" happen, we might benefit from focusing on how we choose to respond to life's challenges. For instance, rather than saying we "should" avoid certain behaviors because they lead to suffering, we could focus on cultivating empathy and compassion as intrinsic values that naturally guide us away from harm.

Similarly, reflecting God's nature doesn't necessarily require us to follow a prescribed set of "shoulds." Instead, it can be about embracing a mindset of kindness and understanding, which allows us to act in ways that align with a more compassionate view of the world.

By shifting the focus from prescriptive actions to fostering intrinsic values, we may find more freedom and authenticity in how we live our lives and interact with others. What are your thoughts on this approach?

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking For Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science
by Lia Russ
December 2024

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


Regarding the immigration part- I know this from m[…]

The unconscious aspect of mind is reactionary […]

DEI and Doublespeak

I hope for their sake you are right, SY Borg. How[…]

I am unable to post links here but these provide a[…]